Cargando…

Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection but remains a novel option. We examined if FMT is an effective means of treating recurrent C. difficile infection. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Pamela, Gadani, Akash, Abdul‐Baki, Heitham, Mitre, Ricardo, Mitre, Marcia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12093
_version_ 1783397415006502912
author Kim, Pamela
Gadani, Akash
Abdul‐Baki, Heitham
Mitre, Ricardo
Mitre, Marcia
author_facet Kim, Pamela
Gadani, Akash
Abdul‐Baki, Heitham
Mitre, Ricardo
Mitre, Marcia
author_sort Kim, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection but remains a novel option. We examined if FMT is an effective means of treating recurrent C. difficile infection. METHODS: A retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent FMT was completed. Demographics and other variables, including the use of proton pump inhibitor therapy and history of inflammatory bowel disease, were collected. RESULTS: Twenty‐five patients (71.4%) belonged to a high‐risk population (working in a hospital setting, rehabilitation center, or nursing facility) and a total of 74.3% of patients (n = 26 patients) had no history of proton pump inhibitor use. Twenty‐five patients (71.4%) had used metronidazole prior to transplantation, 35 patients (100%) had used vancomycin, and 7 patients (20%) had used fidaxomicin for prior infection. Four patients (11.4%) had used all three antibiotics during prior treatment. Of the eight patients who had a history of inflammatory bowel disease, six (75%) experienced resolution of symptoms after transplantation. A total of 30 patients (85.7%) had resolution of their symptoms 6–8 weeks’ posttransplant, while 5 patients (14.3%) continued to have symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective chart review supports that patients benefit from FMT in the setting of recurrent C. difficile infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6386733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63867332019-03-04 Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review Kim, Pamela Gadani, Akash Abdul‐Baki, Heitham Mitre, Ricardo Mitre, Marcia JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection but remains a novel option. We examined if FMT is an effective means of treating recurrent C. difficile infection. METHODS: A retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent FMT was completed. Demographics and other variables, including the use of proton pump inhibitor therapy and history of inflammatory bowel disease, were collected. RESULTS: Twenty‐five patients (71.4%) belonged to a high‐risk population (working in a hospital setting, rehabilitation center, or nursing facility) and a total of 74.3% of patients (n = 26 patients) had no history of proton pump inhibitor use. Twenty‐five patients (71.4%) had used metronidazole prior to transplantation, 35 patients (100%) had used vancomycin, and 7 patients (20%) had used fidaxomicin for prior infection. Four patients (11.4%) had used all three antibiotics during prior treatment. Of the eight patients who had a history of inflammatory bowel disease, six (75%) experienced resolution of symptoms after transplantation. A total of 30 patients (85.7%) had resolution of their symptoms 6–8 weeks’ posttransplant, while 5 patients (14.3%) continued to have symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective chart review supports that patients benefit from FMT in the setting of recurrent C. difficile infection. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6386733/ /pubmed/30834334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12093 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kim, Pamela
Gadani, Akash
Abdul‐Baki, Heitham
Mitre, Ricardo
Mitre, Marcia
Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title_full Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title_fullStr Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title_full_unstemmed Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title_short Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A retrospective single‐center chart review
title_sort fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective single‐center chart review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12093
work_keys_str_mv AT kimpamela fecalmicrobiotatransplantationinrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionaretrospectivesinglecenterchartreview
AT gadaniakash fecalmicrobiotatransplantationinrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionaretrospectivesinglecenterchartreview
AT abdulbakiheitham fecalmicrobiotatransplantationinrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionaretrospectivesinglecenterchartreview
AT mitrericardo fecalmicrobiotatransplantationinrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionaretrospectivesinglecenterchartreview
AT mitremarcia fecalmicrobiotatransplantationinrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionaretrospectivesinglecenterchartreview