Cargando…

Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic placement of a self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS), an alternative to surgical bypass for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is commonly performed using a forward‐viewing endoscope with a wide therapeutic channel; however, due to limited availabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Vinay, Ghoshal, Uday C, Mohindra, Samir, Saraswat, Vivek A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12110
_version_ 1783397417593339904
author Kumar, Vinay
Ghoshal, Uday C
Mohindra, Samir
Saraswat, Vivek A
author_facet Kumar, Vinay
Ghoshal, Uday C
Mohindra, Samir
Saraswat, Vivek A
author_sort Kumar, Vinay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The endoscopic placement of a self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS), an alternative to surgical bypass for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is commonly performed using a forward‐viewing endoscope with a wide therapeutic channel; however, due to limited availability, most Indian centers use a side‐viewing duodenoscope. We studied the feasibility and outcome of SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes. METHOD: Data of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes with a therapeutic channel for the palliation of malignant GOO presenting during a 5‐year period were analyzed retrospectively. Follow‐up data were obtained from records and telephonic interviews, and technical and clinical success, complications, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 114 patients (age 56.5 ± 11.6 years, 59 [52%] female), 90 (79%) and 24 (21%) underwent SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes, respectively. Technical (89, 98.9% vs. 24, 100%, P = ns) and clinical success (84, 93.3% vs. 23, 95.8%, P = ns) and complication rate (3, 3.3% vs. 0, P = ns) between side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes were comparable. However, SEMS could be placed in a shorter time using a forward‐ rather than side‐viewing endoscope (21 min [inter‐quartile range 19.5–35] vs. 34 min [25–45], P = < 0.001). SEMS could be deployed successfully with a forward‐viewing endoscope in two patients in whom an initial attempt using side‐viewing endoscope failed. Gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) improved following stent placement (median 0, range 0–2 vs. 2, 0–3, P = 0.0001). The survival of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes was comparable. CONCLUSION: Although side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes are equally effective for antroduodenal SEMS placement, the procedure can be performed faster using the latter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6386745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63867452019-03-04 Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome Kumar, Vinay Ghoshal, Uday C Mohindra, Samir Saraswat, Vivek A JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: The endoscopic placement of a self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS), an alternative to surgical bypass for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is commonly performed using a forward‐viewing endoscope with a wide therapeutic channel; however, due to limited availability, most Indian centers use a side‐viewing duodenoscope. We studied the feasibility and outcome of SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes. METHOD: Data of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes with a therapeutic channel for the palliation of malignant GOO presenting during a 5‐year period were analyzed retrospectively. Follow‐up data were obtained from records and telephonic interviews, and technical and clinical success, complications, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 114 patients (age 56.5 ± 11.6 years, 59 [52%] female), 90 (79%) and 24 (21%) underwent SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes, respectively. Technical (89, 98.9% vs. 24, 100%, P = ns) and clinical success (84, 93.3% vs. 23, 95.8%, P = ns) and complication rate (3, 3.3% vs. 0, P = ns) between side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes were comparable. However, SEMS could be placed in a shorter time using a forward‐ rather than side‐viewing endoscope (21 min [inter‐quartile range 19.5–35] vs. 34 min [25–45], P = < 0.001). SEMS could be deployed successfully with a forward‐viewing endoscope in two patients in whom an initial attempt using side‐viewing endoscope failed. Gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) improved following stent placement (median 0, range 0–2 vs. 2, 0–3, P = 0.0001). The survival of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes was comparable. CONCLUSION: Although side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscopes are equally effective for antroduodenal SEMS placement, the procedure can be performed faster using the latter. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6386745/ /pubmed/30834343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12110 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kumar, Vinay
Ghoshal, Uday C
Mohindra, Samir
Saraswat, Vivek A
Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title_full Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title_fullStr Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title_full_unstemmed Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title_short Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome
title_sort palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self‐expandable metal stent using side‐ and forward‐viewing endoscope: feasibility and outcome
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12110
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarvinay palliationofmalignantgastroduodenalobstructionwithselfexpandablemetalstentusingsideandforwardviewingendoscopefeasibilityandoutcome
AT ghoshaludayc palliationofmalignantgastroduodenalobstructionwithselfexpandablemetalstentusingsideandforwardviewingendoscopefeasibilityandoutcome
AT mohindrasamir palliationofmalignantgastroduodenalobstructionwithselfexpandablemetalstentusingsideandforwardviewingendoscopefeasibilityandoutcome
AT saraswatviveka palliationofmalignantgastroduodenalobstructionwithselfexpandablemetalstentusingsideandforwardviewingendoscopefeasibilityandoutcome