Cargando…

Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review

Applying the concepts of technological ecosystems to the care and assistance domain is an emerging field that has gained interest during the last years, as they allow to describe the complex relationships between actors in a technologically boosted care domain. In that context, this paper presents a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcos-Pablos, Samuel, García-Peñalvo, Francisco José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030708
_version_ 1783397487638216704
author Marcos-Pablos, Samuel
García-Peñalvo, Francisco José
author_facet Marcos-Pablos, Samuel
García-Peñalvo, Francisco José
author_sort Marcos-Pablos, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Applying the concepts of technological ecosystems to the care and assistance domain is an emerging field that has gained interest during the last years, as they allow to describe the complex relationships between actors in a technologically boosted care domain. In that context, this paper presents a systematic review and mapping of the literature to identify, analyse and classify the published research carried out to provide care and assistance services under a technological ecosystems’ perspective. Thirty-seven papers were identified in the literature as relevant and analysed in detail (between 2003–2018). The main findings show that it is indeed an emerging field, as few of the found ecosystem proposals have been developed in the real world nor have they been tested with real users. In addition, a lot of research to date reports the proposal of platform-centric architectures developed over existing platforms not specifically developed for care and services provision. Employed sensor technologies for providing services have very diverse natures depending on the intended services to be provided. However, many of these technologies do not take into account medical standards. The degree of the ecosystems’ openness to adding new devices greatly depends on the approach followed, such as the type of middleware considered. Thus, there is still much work to be done in order to equate other more established ecosystems such as business or software ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6387066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63870662019-02-26 Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review Marcos-Pablos, Samuel García-Peñalvo, Francisco José Sensors (Basel) Review Applying the concepts of technological ecosystems to the care and assistance domain is an emerging field that has gained interest during the last years, as they allow to describe the complex relationships between actors in a technologically boosted care domain. In that context, this paper presents a systematic review and mapping of the literature to identify, analyse and classify the published research carried out to provide care and assistance services under a technological ecosystems’ perspective. Thirty-seven papers were identified in the literature as relevant and analysed in detail (between 2003–2018). The main findings show that it is indeed an emerging field, as few of the found ecosystem proposals have been developed in the real world nor have they been tested with real users. In addition, a lot of research to date reports the proposal of platform-centric architectures developed over existing platforms not specifically developed for care and services provision. Employed sensor technologies for providing services have very diverse natures depending on the intended services to be provided. However, many of these technologies do not take into account medical standards. The degree of the ecosystems’ openness to adding new devices greatly depends on the approach followed, such as the type of middleware considered. Thus, there is still much work to be done in order to equate other more established ecosystems such as business or software ecosystems. MDPI 2019-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6387066/ /pubmed/30744096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030708 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Marcos-Pablos, Samuel
García-Peñalvo, Francisco José
Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Technological Ecosystems in Care and Assistance: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort technological ecosystems in care and assistance: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030708
work_keys_str_mv AT marcospablossamuel technologicalecosystemsincareandassistanceasystematicliteraturereview
AT garciapenalvofranciscojose technologicalecosystemsincareandassistanceasystematicliteraturereview