Cargando…

Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †

The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lian Sang, Cung, Adams, Michael, Hörmann, Timm, Hesse, Marc, Porrmann, Mario, Rückert, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616
_version_ 1783397569935704064
author Lian Sang, Cung
Adams, Michael
Hörmann, Timm
Hesse, Marc
Porrmann, Mario
Rückert, Ulrich
author_facet Lian Sang, Cung
Adams, Michael
Hörmann, Timm
Hesse, Marc
Porrmann, Mario
Rückert, Ulrich
author_sort Lian Sang, Cung
collection PubMed
description The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing error model, described in the IEEE 802.15.4-2011 standard, is solely based on clock drift. However, it is inadequate for in-depth comparative analysis between different TWR methods. In this paper, we propose a novel TOF Error Estimation Model (TEEM) for TWR methods. Using the proposed model, we evaluate the comparative analysis between different TWR methods. The analytical results were validated with both numerical simulation and experimental results. Moreover, we demonstrate the pitfalls of the symmetric double-sided TWR (SDS-TWR) method, which is the most highlighted TWR method in the literature because of its highly accurate performance on clock-drift error reduction when reply times are symmetric. We argue that alternative double-sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) outperforms SDS-TWR. The argument was verified with both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6387385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63873852019-02-26 Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † Lian Sang, Cung Adams, Michael Hörmann, Timm Hesse, Marc Porrmann, Mario Rückert, Ulrich Sensors (Basel) Article The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing error model, described in the IEEE 802.15.4-2011 standard, is solely based on clock drift. However, it is inadequate for in-depth comparative analysis between different TWR methods. In this paper, we propose a novel TOF Error Estimation Model (TEEM) for TWR methods. Using the proposed model, we evaluate the comparative analysis between different TWR methods. The analytical results were validated with both numerical simulation and experimental results. Moreover, we demonstrate the pitfalls of the symmetric double-sided TWR (SDS-TWR) method, which is the most highlighted TWR method in the literature because of its highly accurate performance on clock-drift error reduction when reply times are symmetric. We argue that alternative double-sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) outperforms SDS-TWR. The argument was verified with both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation results. MDPI 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6387385/ /pubmed/30717177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lian Sang, Cung
Adams, Michael
Hörmann, Timm
Hesse, Marc
Porrmann, Mario
Rückert, Ulrich
Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title_full Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title_fullStr Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title_full_unstemmed Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title_short Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
title_sort numerical and experimental evaluation of error estimation for two-way ranging methods †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616
work_keys_str_mv AT liansangcung numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods
AT adamsmichael numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods
AT hormanntimm numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods
AT hessemarc numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods
AT porrmannmario numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods
AT ruckertulrich numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods