Cargando…
Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods †
The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616 |
_version_ | 1783397569935704064 |
---|---|
author | Lian Sang, Cung Adams, Michael Hörmann, Timm Hesse, Marc Porrmann, Mario Rückert, Ulrich |
author_facet | Lian Sang, Cung Adams, Michael Hörmann, Timm Hesse, Marc Porrmann, Mario Rückert, Ulrich |
author_sort | Lian Sang, Cung |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing error model, described in the IEEE 802.15.4-2011 standard, is solely based on clock drift. However, it is inadequate for in-depth comparative analysis between different TWR methods. In this paper, we propose a novel TOF Error Estimation Model (TEEM) for TWR methods. Using the proposed model, we evaluate the comparative analysis between different TWR methods. The analytical results were validated with both numerical simulation and experimental results. Moreover, we demonstrate the pitfalls of the symmetric double-sided TWR (SDS-TWR) method, which is the most highlighted TWR method in the literature because of its highly accurate performance on clock-drift error reduction when reply times are symmetric. We argue that alternative double-sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) outperforms SDS-TWR. The argument was verified with both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6387385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63873852019-02-26 Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † Lian Sang, Cung Adams, Michael Hörmann, Timm Hesse, Marc Porrmann, Mario Rückert, Ulrich Sensors (Basel) Article The Two-Way Ranging (TWR) method is commonly used for measuring the distance between two wireless transceiver nodes, especially when clock synchronization between the two nodes is not available. For modeling the time-of-flight (TOF) error between two wireless transceiver nodes in TWR, the existing error model, described in the IEEE 802.15.4-2011 standard, is solely based on clock drift. However, it is inadequate for in-depth comparative analysis between different TWR methods. In this paper, we propose a novel TOF Error Estimation Model (TEEM) for TWR methods. Using the proposed model, we evaluate the comparative analysis between different TWR methods. The analytical results were validated with both numerical simulation and experimental results. Moreover, we demonstrate the pitfalls of the symmetric double-sided TWR (SDS-TWR) method, which is the most highlighted TWR method in the literature because of its highly accurate performance on clock-drift error reduction when reply times are symmetric. We argue that alternative double-sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) outperforms SDS-TWR. The argument was verified with both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation results. MDPI 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6387385/ /pubmed/30717177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lian Sang, Cung Adams, Michael Hörmann, Timm Hesse, Marc Porrmann, Mario Rückert, Ulrich Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title | Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title_full | Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title_fullStr | Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title_full_unstemmed | Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title_short | Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Error Estimation for Two-Way Ranging Methods † |
title_sort | numerical and experimental evaluation of error estimation for two-way ranging methods † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liansangcung numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods AT adamsmichael numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods AT hormanntimm numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods AT hessemarc numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods AT porrmannmario numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods AT ruckertulrich numericalandexperimentalevaluationoferrorestimationfortwowayrangingmethods |