Cargando…

The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment

BACKGROUND: The use of guidelines has shown to improve clinical practice process and structure of health care, but health care providers don’t always use and keep up-to-date with the new clinical practice guidelines. Nurses’ attitudes towards guidelines have shown to be the most frequently identifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Wen, Chen, Qian, Zhang, Xuemei, Elovainio, Marko, Huang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0682-3
_version_ 1783397589785247744
author Yan, Wen
Chen, Qian
Zhang, Xuemei
Elovainio, Marko
Huang, Yan
author_facet Yan, Wen
Chen, Qian
Zhang, Xuemei
Elovainio, Marko
Huang, Yan
author_sort Yan, Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of guidelines has shown to improve clinical practice process and structure of health care, but health care providers don’t always use and keep up-to-date with the new clinical practice guidelines. Nurses’ attitudes towards guidelines have shown to be the most frequently identified factor affecting their actual use of clinical practice guidelines, but no instruments for measuring it are available in China. There are scales validated in the western countries, but there is no information about their validity in Chinese health care. The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of Chinese Attitudes towards guidelines - scale for nurses. METHODS: The study was conducted from April to July 2017. The Attitudes towards guidelines scale was translated into Chinese with forward-backward translation method and a questionnaire survey was conducted. Eight hundred randomly selected nurses (final N = 768) from Geriatrics, Internal medical and Rehabilitation departments of 16 hospitals were drawn in Sichuan province, China. Construct validity was evaluated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability was assessed by test-retest reliability (represented by intra class correlation) and internal consistency (expressed by Cronbach’s coefficients). The test-retest reliability was examined with a sample of 32 clinical nurses who filled out the questionnaire 14 days after the first survey. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis supported a four-factor model for the Chinese version of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the hypothetical four-factor model fitted the data relatively well. The intra class correlation coefficient was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.68–0.93) and the Cronbach’s alpha values for the four subscales ranged from 0.645 to 0.912. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the acceptable level of validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Attitudes towards guidelines scale, which can be used to assess nurses’ attitudes towards guidelines in China. Future testing for the Chinese version of Attitudes towards guidelines scale needs to be carried out to see whether these results are generalizable to other professionals and occupational groups and to be used to revise attitudes towards specific guidelines in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6387474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63874742019-03-04 The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment Yan, Wen Chen, Qian Zhang, Xuemei Elovainio, Marko Huang, Yan BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of guidelines has shown to improve clinical practice process and structure of health care, but health care providers don’t always use and keep up-to-date with the new clinical practice guidelines. Nurses’ attitudes towards guidelines have shown to be the most frequently identified factor affecting their actual use of clinical practice guidelines, but no instruments for measuring it are available in China. There are scales validated in the western countries, but there is no information about their validity in Chinese health care. The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of Chinese Attitudes towards guidelines - scale for nurses. METHODS: The study was conducted from April to July 2017. The Attitudes towards guidelines scale was translated into Chinese with forward-backward translation method and a questionnaire survey was conducted. Eight hundred randomly selected nurses (final N = 768) from Geriatrics, Internal medical and Rehabilitation departments of 16 hospitals were drawn in Sichuan province, China. Construct validity was evaluated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability was assessed by test-retest reliability (represented by intra class correlation) and internal consistency (expressed by Cronbach’s coefficients). The test-retest reliability was examined with a sample of 32 clinical nurses who filled out the questionnaire 14 days after the first survey. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis supported a four-factor model for the Chinese version of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the hypothetical four-factor model fitted the data relatively well. The intra class correlation coefficient was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.68–0.93) and the Cronbach’s alpha values for the four subscales ranged from 0.645 to 0.912. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the acceptable level of validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Attitudes towards guidelines scale, which can be used to assess nurses’ attitudes towards guidelines in China. Future testing for the Chinese version of Attitudes towards guidelines scale needs to be carried out to see whether these results are generalizable to other professionals and occupational groups and to be used to revise attitudes towards specific guidelines in China. BioMed Central 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6387474/ /pubmed/30795736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0682-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Wen
Chen, Qian
Zhang, Xuemei
Elovainio, Marko
Huang, Yan
The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title_full The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title_fullStr The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title_full_unstemmed The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title_short The Chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
title_sort chinese version of attitudes towards guidelines scale: validity and reliability assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0682-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yanwen thechineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT chenqian thechineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT zhangxuemei thechineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT elovainiomarko thechineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT huangyan thechineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT yanwen chineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT chenqian chineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT zhangxuemei chineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT elovainiomarko chineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment
AT huangyan chineseversionofattitudestowardsguidelinesscalevalidityandreliabilityassessment