Cargando…

Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may be minimized by the limited disease burden of lymph node metastases and tailoring adjuvant therapy based on breast cancer biology. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic significance of SLN metastasis in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shigematsu, Hideo, Nishina, Mai, Yasui, Daisuke, Hirata, Taizo, Ozaki, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30797231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1585-9
_version_ 1783397634523791360
author Shigematsu, Hideo
Nishina, Mai
Yasui, Daisuke
Hirata, Taizo
Ozaki, Shinji
author_facet Shigematsu, Hideo
Nishina, Mai
Yasui, Daisuke
Hirata, Taizo
Ozaki, Shinji
author_sort Shigematsu, Hideo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may be minimized by the limited disease burden of lymph node metastases and tailoring adjuvant therapy based on breast cancer biology. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic significance of SLN metastasis in patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2015, 582 patients underwent SLN biopsy for cT1–2N0M0 breast cancers. cN0 was essentially diagnosed by ultrasound sonography. The prognostic values of SLN metastases were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Among 582 patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer, 111 patients (19.1%) were positive for SLN metastasis, including 39 cases (6.7%) of micrometastasis and 72 cases (12.4%) of macrometastases. The median size of SLN metastasis was 3.0 mm (range 0.2–16 mm, mean 4.1 mm). In log-rank test, presence of SLN metastasis was not associated with breast cancer recurrence (p = 0.21); 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 93.0% and 96.5%, and 93.0% and 90.4% in the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups, respectively. In the propensity score matching cohort (n = 178), there was no significant difference in RFS between the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups (p = 0.90). In Cox regression analysis, a continuous value of Ki67 expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: SLN metastasis has a minimal impact on RFS for patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer in the modern medical era. A proliferation marker is a better factor for poor prognosis than the presence of SLN metastases in this population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1585-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6387738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63877382019-03-04 Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer Shigematsu, Hideo Nishina, Mai Yasui, Daisuke Hirata, Taizo Ozaki, Shinji World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may be minimized by the limited disease burden of lymph node metastases and tailoring adjuvant therapy based on breast cancer biology. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic significance of SLN metastasis in patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2015, 582 patients underwent SLN biopsy for cT1–2N0M0 breast cancers. cN0 was essentially diagnosed by ultrasound sonography. The prognostic values of SLN metastases were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Among 582 patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer, 111 patients (19.1%) were positive for SLN metastasis, including 39 cases (6.7%) of micrometastasis and 72 cases (12.4%) of macrometastases. The median size of SLN metastasis was 3.0 mm (range 0.2–16 mm, mean 4.1 mm). In log-rank test, presence of SLN metastasis was not associated with breast cancer recurrence (p = 0.21); 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 93.0% and 96.5%, and 93.0% and 90.4% in the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups, respectively. In the propensity score matching cohort (n = 178), there was no significant difference in RFS between the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups (p = 0.90). In Cox regression analysis, a continuous value of Ki67 expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: SLN metastasis has a minimal impact on RFS for patients with cT1–2N0M0 breast cancer in the modern medical era. A proliferation marker is a better factor for poor prognosis than the presence of SLN metastases in this population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1585-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6387738/ /pubmed/30797231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1585-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shigematsu, Hideo
Nishina, Mai
Yasui, Daisuke
Hirata, Taizo
Ozaki, Shinji
Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title_full Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title_fullStr Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title_short Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1–2 and cN0 breast cancer
title_sort minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with ct1–2 and cn0 breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30797231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1585-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shigematsuhideo minimalprognosticsignificanceofsentinellymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithct12andcn0breastcancer
AT nishinamai minimalprognosticsignificanceofsentinellymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithct12andcn0breastcancer
AT yasuidaisuke minimalprognosticsignificanceofsentinellymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithct12andcn0breastcancer
AT hiratataizo minimalprognosticsignificanceofsentinellymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithct12andcn0breastcancer
AT ozakishinji minimalprognosticsignificanceofsentinellymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithct12andcn0breastcancer