Cargando…
The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392 |
_version_ | 1783397709045039104 |
---|---|
author | Brotons, Alicia Guilabert, Mercedes Lacueva, Francisco Javier Mira, José Joaquín Lumbreras, Blanca Picó, María Dolores Vitaller, Julián García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe Belda, Germán Sola-Vera, Javier |
author_facet | Brotons, Alicia Guilabert, Mercedes Lacueva, Francisco Javier Mira, José Joaquín Lumbreras, Blanca Picó, María Dolores Vitaller, Julián García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe Belda, Germán Sola-Vera, Javier |
author_sort | Brotons, Alicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6388170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63881702019-02-27 The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study Brotons, Alicia Guilabert, Mercedes Lacueva, Francisco Javier Mira, José Joaquín Lumbreras, Blanca Picó, María Dolores Vitaller, Julián García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe Belda, Germán Sola-Vera, Javier Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. MDPI 2019-01-30 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388170/ /pubmed/30704126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brotons, Alicia Guilabert, Mercedes Lacueva, Francisco Javier Mira, José Joaquín Lumbreras, Blanca Picó, María Dolores Vitaller, Julián García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe Belda, Germán Sola-Vera, Javier The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title | The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title_full | The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title_fullStr | The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title_short | The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study |
title_sort | colonoscopy satisfaction and safety questionnaire (cssqp) for colorectal cancer screening: a development and validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brotonsalicia thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT guilabertmercedes thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT lacuevafranciscojavier thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT mirajosejoaquin thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT lumbrerasblanca thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT picomariadolores thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT vitallerjulian thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT garciasepulcremarianafe thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT beldagerman thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT solaverajavier thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT brotonsalicia colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT guilabertmercedes colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT lacuevafranciscojavier colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT mirajosejoaquin colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT lumbrerasblanca colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT picomariadolores colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT vitallerjulian colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT garciasepulcremarianafe colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT beldagerman colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT solaverajavier colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy |