Cargando…

The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brotons, Alicia, Guilabert, Mercedes, Lacueva, Francisco Javier, Mira, José Joaquín, Lumbreras, Blanca, Picó, María Dolores, Vitaller, Julián, García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe, Belda, Germán, Sola-Vera, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392
_version_ 1783397709045039104
author Brotons, Alicia
Guilabert, Mercedes
Lacueva, Francisco Javier
Mira, José Joaquín
Lumbreras, Blanca
Picó, María Dolores
Vitaller, Julián
García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe
Belda, Germán
Sola-Vera, Javier
author_facet Brotons, Alicia
Guilabert, Mercedes
Lacueva, Francisco Javier
Mira, José Joaquín
Lumbreras, Blanca
Picó, María Dolores
Vitaller, Julián
García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe
Belda, Germán
Sola-Vera, Javier
author_sort Brotons, Alicia
collection PubMed
description Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63881702019-02-27 The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study Brotons, Alicia Guilabert, Mercedes Lacueva, Francisco Javier Mira, José Joaquín Lumbreras, Blanca Picó, María Dolores Vitaller, Julián García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe Belda, Germán Sola-Vera, Javier Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. MDPI 2019-01-30 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388170/ /pubmed/30704126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brotons, Alicia
Guilabert, Mercedes
Lacueva, Francisco Javier
Mira, José Joaquín
Lumbreras, Blanca
Picó, María Dolores
Vitaller, Julián
García-Sepulcre, Mariana Fe
Belda, Germán
Sola-Vera, Javier
The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title_full The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title_fullStr The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title_short The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
title_sort colonoscopy satisfaction and safety questionnaire (cssqp) for colorectal cancer screening: a development and validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030392
work_keys_str_mv AT brotonsalicia thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT guilabertmercedes thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT lacuevafranciscojavier thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT mirajosejoaquin thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT lumbrerasblanca thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT picomariadolores thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT vitallerjulian thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT garciasepulcremarianafe thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT beldagerman thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT solaverajavier thecolonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT brotonsalicia colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT guilabertmercedes colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT lacuevafranciscojavier colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT mirajosejoaquin colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT lumbrerasblanca colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT picomariadolores colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT vitallerjulian colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT garciasepulcremarianafe colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT beldagerman colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy
AT solaverajavier colonoscopysatisfactionandsafetyquestionnairecssqpforcolorectalcancerscreeningadevelopmentandvalidationstudy