Cargando…

Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility

Patients with orthopedic problems often use assistive devices, e.g., ankle-foot orthoses and therapeutic footwear, to support their mobility. However, many users are not satisfied with their devices or do not use them at all, resulting in a decrease of quality of life. It has been shown that a main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holtkamp, Fred C., Wouters, Eveline J.M., Verkerk, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030318
_version_ 1783397726160945152
author Holtkamp, Fred C.
Wouters, Eveline J.M.
Verkerk, Maarten J.
author_facet Holtkamp, Fred C.
Wouters, Eveline J.M.
Verkerk, Maarten J.
author_sort Holtkamp, Fred C.
collection PubMed
description Patients with orthopedic problems often use assistive devices, e.g., ankle-foot orthoses and therapeutic footwear, to support their mobility. However, many users are not satisfied with their devices or do not use them at all, resulting in a decrease of quality of life. It has been shown that a main cause for dissatisfaction and non-use lies in the process of drawing up requirements. It appears that orthopedic engineers have too little insight in the different areas of life of patients leading to deficient design requirements. In this article a general approach—the so-called Triple I model—is presented to understand the different areas of life of patients. This model offers, in line with and directed by the intention of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model three perspectives or ‘pairs of lenses’ to analyze these areas of life: the identity, the interests of key stakeholders or social actors, and the underlying societal ideals. The Triple I model is elaborated for assistive devices and offers an associated methodology to orthopedic engineers to systematically map the different areas of life of patients, to understand the requirements for every area, and to explore the conditions. In case of assistive devices five different areas of life have to be investigated: daily living at home, work, transport, social and spiritual activities, sport and leisure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63882432019-02-27 Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility Holtkamp, Fred C. Wouters, Eveline J.M. Verkerk, Maarten J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Patients with orthopedic problems often use assistive devices, e.g., ankle-foot orthoses and therapeutic footwear, to support their mobility. However, many users are not satisfied with their devices or do not use them at all, resulting in a decrease of quality of life. It has been shown that a main cause for dissatisfaction and non-use lies in the process of drawing up requirements. It appears that orthopedic engineers have too little insight in the different areas of life of patients leading to deficient design requirements. In this article a general approach—the so-called Triple I model—is presented to understand the different areas of life of patients. This model offers, in line with and directed by the intention of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model three perspectives or ‘pairs of lenses’ to analyze these areas of life: the identity, the interests of key stakeholders or social actors, and the underlying societal ideals. The Triple I model is elaborated for assistive devices and offers an associated methodology to orthopedic engineers to systematically map the different areas of life of patients, to understand the requirements for every area, and to explore the conditions. In case of assistive devices five different areas of life have to be investigated: daily living at home, work, transport, social and spiritual activities, sport and leisure. MDPI 2019-01-24 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388243/ /pubmed/30678372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030318 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Holtkamp, Fred C.
Wouters, Eveline J.M.
Verkerk, Maarten J.
Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title_full Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title_fullStr Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title_full_unstemmed Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title_short Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility
title_sort understanding user practices when drawing up requirements—the case of designing assistive devices for mobility
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030318
work_keys_str_mv AT holtkampfredc understandinguserpracticeswhendrawinguprequirementsthecaseofdesigningassistivedevicesformobility
AT woutersevelinejm understandinguserpracticeswhendrawinguprequirementsthecaseofdesigningassistivedevicesformobility
AT verkerkmaartenj understandinguserpracticeswhendrawinguprequirementsthecaseofdesigningassistivedevicesformobility