Cargando…

The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits

This study analyzed the effects physical fitness may have on reasons for academy separation in law enforcement recruits. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 401 recruits; 330 recruits graduated (GRAD), and 71 recruits separated at various times during academy. Twenty-eight recruits separated f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockie, Robert G., Balfany, Katherine, Bloodgood, Ashley M., Moreno, Matthew R., Cesario, Karly A., Dulla, Joseph M., Dawes, J. Jay, Orr, Robin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30699898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030372
_version_ 1783397728011681792
author Lockie, Robert G.
Balfany, Katherine
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Cesario, Karly A.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Dawes, J. Jay
Orr, Robin M.
author_facet Lockie, Robert G.
Balfany, Katherine
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Cesario, Karly A.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Dawes, J. Jay
Orr, Robin M.
author_sort Lockie, Robert G.
collection PubMed
description This study analyzed the effects physical fitness may have on reasons for academy separation in law enforcement recruits. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 401 recruits; 330 recruits graduated (GRAD), and 71 recruits separated at various times during academy. Twenty-eight recruits separated for personal reasons (SEPPR); 18 due to physical training failures (i.e., poor fitness) or injury (SEPFI); and 25 due to academic or scenario failures (SEPAS). Fitness testing occurred prior to academy, and included: Push-ups and sit-ups in 60s; a 75-yard pursuit run (75PR); vertical jump; medicine ball throw; and multistage fitness test (MSFT). A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc compared between-group fitness test performance. A multiple stepwise regression calculated whether recruit characteristics or fitness could predict separation. The GRAD group was younger than the SEPAS group (p < 0.01), faster in the 75PR than the SEPFI group (p = 0.02), and completed more MSFT shuttles than the SEPPR and SEPFI groups (p = 0.01). Age predicted GRAD and SEPAS group inclusion; MSFT predicted GRAD, SEPPR, and SEPFI group inclusion. Recruits who had superior high-intensity running capacity (75PR) and aerobic fitness (MSFT) should have a better chance of completing academy. However, this could be influenced by training practices adopted during academy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63882512019-02-27 The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits Lockie, Robert G. Balfany, Katherine Bloodgood, Ashley M. Moreno, Matthew R. Cesario, Karly A. Dulla, Joseph M. Dawes, J. Jay Orr, Robin M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study analyzed the effects physical fitness may have on reasons for academy separation in law enforcement recruits. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 401 recruits; 330 recruits graduated (GRAD), and 71 recruits separated at various times during academy. Twenty-eight recruits separated for personal reasons (SEPPR); 18 due to physical training failures (i.e., poor fitness) or injury (SEPFI); and 25 due to academic or scenario failures (SEPAS). Fitness testing occurred prior to academy, and included: Push-ups and sit-ups in 60s; a 75-yard pursuit run (75PR); vertical jump; medicine ball throw; and multistage fitness test (MSFT). A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc compared between-group fitness test performance. A multiple stepwise regression calculated whether recruit characteristics or fitness could predict separation. The GRAD group was younger than the SEPAS group (p < 0.01), faster in the 75PR than the SEPFI group (p = 0.02), and completed more MSFT shuttles than the SEPPR and SEPFI groups (p = 0.01). Age predicted GRAD and SEPAS group inclusion; MSFT predicted GRAD, SEPPR, and SEPFI group inclusion. Recruits who had superior high-intensity running capacity (75PR) and aerobic fitness (MSFT) should have a better chance of completing academy. However, this could be influenced by training practices adopted during academy. MDPI 2019-01-29 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388251/ /pubmed/30699898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030372 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lockie, Robert G.
Balfany, Katherine
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Cesario, Karly A.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Dawes, J. Jay
Orr, Robin M.
The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title_full The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title_fullStr The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title_short The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits
title_sort influence of physical fitness on reasons for academy separation in law enforcement recruits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30699898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030372
work_keys_str_mv AT lockierobertg theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT balfanykatherine theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT bloodgoodashleym theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT morenomatthewr theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT cesariokarlya theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT dullajosephm theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT dawesjjay theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT orrrobinm theinfluenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT lockierobertg influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT balfanykatherine influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT bloodgoodashleym influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT morenomatthewr influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT cesariokarlya influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT dullajosephm influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT dawesjjay influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits
AT orrrobinm influenceofphysicalfitnessonreasonsforacademyseparationinlawenforcementrecruits