Cargando…

Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review

The number of Australians seeking food aid has increased in recent years; however, the current variability in the measurement of food insecurity means that the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in Australia is likely underreported. This is compounded by infrequent national health surveys th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKay, Fiona H., Haines, Bronte C., Dunn, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030476
_version_ 1783397733802967040
author McKay, Fiona H.
Haines, Bronte C.
Dunn, Matthew
author_facet McKay, Fiona H.
Haines, Bronte C.
Dunn, Matthew
author_sort McKay, Fiona H.
collection PubMed
description The number of Australians seeking food aid has increased in recent years; however, the current variability in the measurement of food insecurity means that the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in Australia is likely underreported. This is compounded by infrequent national health surveys that measure food insecurity, resulting in outdated population-level food insecurity data. This review sought to investigate the breadth of food insecurity research conducted in Australia to evaluate how this construct is being measured. A systematic review was conducted to collate the available Australian research. Fifty-seven publications were reviewed. Twenty-two used a single-item measure to examine food security status; 11 used the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM); two used the Radimer/Cornell instrument; one used the Household Food and Nutrition Security Survey (HFNSS); while the remainder used a less rigorous or unidentified method. A wide range in prevalence and severity of food insecurity in the community was reported; food insecurity ranged from 2% to 90%, depending on the measurement tool and population under investigation. Based on the findings of this review, the authors suggest that there needs to be greater consistency in measuring food insecurity, and that work is needed to create a measure of food insecurity tailored for the Australian context. Such a tool will allow researchers to gain a clear understanding of the prevalence of food insecurity in Australia to create better policy and practice responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63882762019-02-27 Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review McKay, Fiona H. Haines, Bronte C. Dunn, Matthew Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The number of Australians seeking food aid has increased in recent years; however, the current variability in the measurement of food insecurity means that the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in Australia is likely underreported. This is compounded by infrequent national health surveys that measure food insecurity, resulting in outdated population-level food insecurity data. This review sought to investigate the breadth of food insecurity research conducted in Australia to evaluate how this construct is being measured. A systematic review was conducted to collate the available Australian research. Fifty-seven publications were reviewed. Twenty-two used a single-item measure to examine food security status; 11 used the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM); two used the Radimer/Cornell instrument; one used the Household Food and Nutrition Security Survey (HFNSS); while the remainder used a less rigorous or unidentified method. A wide range in prevalence and severity of food insecurity in the community was reported; food insecurity ranged from 2% to 90%, depending on the measurement tool and population under investigation. Based on the findings of this review, the authors suggest that there needs to be greater consistency in measuring food insecurity, and that work is needed to create a measure of food insecurity tailored for the Australian context. Such a tool will allow researchers to gain a clear understanding of the prevalence of food insecurity in Australia to create better policy and practice responses. MDPI 2019-02-06 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388276/ /pubmed/30736305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030476 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
McKay, Fiona H.
Haines, Bronte C.
Dunn, Matthew
Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_full Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_short Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_sort measuring and understanding food insecurity in australia: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030476
work_keys_str_mv AT mckayfionah measuringandunderstandingfoodinsecurityinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT hainesbrontec measuringandunderstandingfoodinsecurityinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT dunnmatthew measuringandunderstandingfoodinsecurityinaustraliaasystematicreview