Cargando…

“Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering

Public health has always been, and remains, an interdisciplinary field, and engineering was closely aligned with public health for many years. Indeed, the branch of engineering that has been known at various times as sanitary engineering, public health engineering, or environmental engineering was i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gelting, Richard J., Chapra, Steven C., Nevin, Paul E., Harvey, David E., Gute, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30700061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030387
_version_ 1783397758057578496
author Gelting, Richard J.
Chapra, Steven C.
Nevin, Paul E.
Harvey, David E.
Gute, David M.
author_facet Gelting, Richard J.
Chapra, Steven C.
Nevin, Paul E.
Harvey, David E.
Gute, David M.
author_sort Gelting, Richard J.
collection PubMed
description Public health has always been, and remains, an interdisciplinary field, and engineering was closely aligned with public health for many years. Indeed, the branch of engineering that has been known at various times as sanitary engineering, public health engineering, or environmental engineering was integral to the emergence of public health as a distinct discipline. However, in the United States (U.S.) during the 20th century, the academic preparation and practice of this branch of engineering became largely separated from public health. Various factors contributed to this separation, including an evolution in leadership roles within public health; increasing specialization within public health; and the emerging environmental movement, which led to the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with its emphasis on the natural environment. In this paper, we consider these factors in turn. We also present a case study example of public health engineering in current practice in the U.S. that has had large-scale positive health impacts through improving water and sanitation services in Native American and Alaska Native communities. We also consider briefly how to educate engineers to work in public health in the modern world, and the benefits and challenges associated with that process. We close by discussing the global implications of public health engineering and the need to re-integrate engineering into public health practice and strengthen the connection between the two fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63883732019-02-27 “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering Gelting, Richard J. Chapra, Steven C. Nevin, Paul E. Harvey, David E. Gute, David M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Public health has always been, and remains, an interdisciplinary field, and engineering was closely aligned with public health for many years. Indeed, the branch of engineering that has been known at various times as sanitary engineering, public health engineering, or environmental engineering was integral to the emergence of public health as a distinct discipline. However, in the United States (U.S.) during the 20th century, the academic preparation and practice of this branch of engineering became largely separated from public health. Various factors contributed to this separation, including an evolution in leadership roles within public health; increasing specialization within public health; and the emerging environmental movement, which led to the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with its emphasis on the natural environment. In this paper, we consider these factors in turn. We also present a case study example of public health engineering in current practice in the U.S. that has had large-scale positive health impacts through improving water and sanitation services in Native American and Alaska Native communities. We also consider briefly how to educate engineers to work in public health in the modern world, and the benefits and challenges associated with that process. We close by discussing the global implications of public health engineering and the need to re-integrate engineering into public health practice and strengthen the connection between the two fields. MDPI 2019-01-29 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6388373/ /pubmed/30700061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030387 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gelting, Richard J.
Chapra, Steven C.
Nevin, Paul E.
Harvey, David E.
Gute, David M.
“Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title_full “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title_fullStr “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title_full_unstemmed “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title_short “Back to the Future”: Time for a Renaissance of Public Health Engineering
title_sort “back to the future”: time for a renaissance of public health engineering
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30700061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030387
work_keys_str_mv AT geltingrichardj backtothefuturetimeforarenaissanceofpublichealthengineering
AT chaprastevenc backtothefuturetimeforarenaissanceofpublichealthengineering
AT nevinpaule backtothefuturetimeforarenaissanceofpublichealthengineering
AT harveydavide backtothefuturetimeforarenaissanceofpublichealthengineering
AT gutedavidm backtothefuturetimeforarenaissanceofpublichealthengineering