Cargando…

Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is significant variability in the materials commonly used for interbody cages in spine surgery. It is theorized that three-dimensional (3D)-printed interbody cages using porous titanium material can provide more consistent bone ingrowth and biological fixation. PURPOSE: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGilvray, Kirk C., Easley, Jeremiah, Seim, Howard B., Regan, Daniel, Berven, Sigurd H., Hsu, Wellington K., Mroz, Thomas E., Puttlitz, Christian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29496624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018
_version_ 1783397795277832192
author McGilvray, Kirk C.
Easley, Jeremiah
Seim, Howard B.
Regan, Daniel
Berven, Sigurd H.
Hsu, Wellington K.
Mroz, Thomas E.
Puttlitz, Christian M.
author_facet McGilvray, Kirk C.
Easley, Jeremiah
Seim, Howard B.
Regan, Daniel
Berven, Sigurd H.
Hsu, Wellington K.
Mroz, Thomas E.
Puttlitz, Christian M.
author_sort McGilvray, Kirk C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is significant variability in the materials commonly used for interbody cages in spine surgery. It is theorized that three-dimensional (3D)-printed interbody cages using porous titanium material can provide more consistent bone ingrowth and biological fixation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based approach to decisionmaking regarding interbody materials for spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative animal study was performed. METHODS: A skeletally mature ovine lumbar fusion model was used for this study. Interbody fusions were performed at L2-L3 and L4-L5 in 27 mature sheep using three different interbody cages (ie, polyetheretherketone [PEEK], plasma sprayed porous titanium-coated PEEK [PSP], and 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cage [PTA]). Non-destructive kinematic testing was performed in the three primary directions of motion. The specimens were then analyzed using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT); quantitative measures of the bony fusion were performed. Histomorphometric analyses were also performed in the sagittal plane through the interbody device. Outcome parameters were compared between cage designs and time points. RESULTS: Flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) was statistically reduced for the PTA group compared with the PEEK cages at 16 weeks (p-value=.02). Only the PTA cages demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in ROM and increase in stiffness across all three loading directions between the 8-week and 16-week sacrifice time points (p-value≤.01). Micro-CT data demonstrated significantly greater total bone volume within the graft window for the PTA cages at both 8 weeks and 16 weeks compared with the PEEK cages (p-value<.01). CONCLUSIONS: A direct comparison of interbody implants demonstrates significant and measurable differences in biomechanical, μ-CT, and histologic performance in an ovine model. The 3Dprinted porous titanium interbody cage resulted in statistically significant reductions in ROM, increases in the bone ingrowth profile, as well as average construct stiffness compared with PEEK and PSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63886162019-02-25 Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model McGilvray, Kirk C. Easley, Jeremiah Seim, Howard B. Regan, Daniel Berven, Sigurd H. Hsu, Wellington K. Mroz, Thomas E. Puttlitz, Christian M. Spine J Article BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is significant variability in the materials commonly used for interbody cages in spine surgery. It is theorized that three-dimensional (3D)-printed interbody cages using porous titanium material can provide more consistent bone ingrowth and biological fixation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based approach to decisionmaking regarding interbody materials for spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative animal study was performed. METHODS: A skeletally mature ovine lumbar fusion model was used for this study. Interbody fusions were performed at L2-L3 and L4-L5 in 27 mature sheep using three different interbody cages (ie, polyetheretherketone [PEEK], plasma sprayed porous titanium-coated PEEK [PSP], and 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cage [PTA]). Non-destructive kinematic testing was performed in the three primary directions of motion. The specimens were then analyzed using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT); quantitative measures of the bony fusion were performed. Histomorphometric analyses were also performed in the sagittal plane through the interbody device. Outcome parameters were compared between cage designs and time points. RESULTS: Flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) was statistically reduced for the PTA group compared with the PEEK cages at 16 weeks (p-value=.02). Only the PTA cages demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in ROM and increase in stiffness across all three loading directions between the 8-week and 16-week sacrifice time points (p-value≤.01). Micro-CT data demonstrated significantly greater total bone volume within the graft window for the PTA cages at both 8 weeks and 16 weeks compared with the PEEK cages (p-value<.01). CONCLUSIONS: A direct comparison of interbody implants demonstrates significant and measurable differences in biomechanical, μ-CT, and histologic performance in an ovine model. The 3Dprinted porous titanium interbody cage resulted in statistically significant reductions in ROM, increases in the bone ingrowth profile, as well as average construct stiffness compared with PEEK and PSP. 2018-02-26 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6388616/ /pubmed/29496624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McGilvray, Kirk C.
Easley, Jeremiah
Seim, Howard B.
Regan, Daniel
Berven, Sigurd H.
Hsu, Wellington K.
Mroz, Thomas E.
Puttlitz, Christian M.
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title_full Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title_fullStr Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title_full_unstemmed Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title_short Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
title_sort bony ingrowth potential of 3d-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29496624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgilvraykirkc bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT easleyjeremiah bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT seimhowardb bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT regandaniel bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT bervensigurdh bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT hsuwellingtonk bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT mrozthomase bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel
AT puttlitzchristianm bonyingrowthpotentialof3dprintedporoustitaniumalloyadirectcomparisonofinterbodycagematerialsinaninvivoovinelumbarfusionmodel