Cargando…

Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials

Participants’ eye movements and electroencephalogram (EEG) signal were recorded as they read sentences displayed according to the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. Two target words in each sentence were manipulated for lexical frequency (high vs. low frequency) and parafoveal preview of each target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Degno, Federica, Loberg, Otto, Zang, Chuanli, Zhang, Manman, Donnelly, Nick, Liversedge, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000494
_version_ 1783397801345941504
author Degno, Federica
Loberg, Otto
Zang, Chuanli
Zhang, Manman
Donnelly, Nick
Liversedge, Simon P.
author_facet Degno, Federica
Loberg, Otto
Zang, Chuanli
Zhang, Manman
Donnelly, Nick
Liversedge, Simon P.
author_sort Degno, Federica
collection PubMed
description Participants’ eye movements and electroencephalogram (EEG) signal were recorded as they read sentences displayed according to the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. Two target words in each sentence were manipulated for lexical frequency (high vs. low frequency) and parafoveal preview of each target word (identical vs. string of random letters vs. string of Xs). Eye movement data revealed visual parafoveal-on-foveal (PoF) effects, as well as foveal visual and orthographic preview effects and word frequency effects. Fixation-related potentials (FRPs) showed visual and orthographic PoF effects as well as foveal visual and orthographic preview effects. Our results replicated the early preview positivity effect (Dimigen, Kliegl, & Sommer, 2012) in the X-string preview condition, and revealed different neural correlates associated with a preview comprised of a string of random letters relative to a string of Xs. The former effects seem likely to reflect difficulty associated with the integration of parafoveal and foveal information, as well as feature overlap, while the latter reflect inhibition, and potentially disruption, to processing underlying reading. Interestingly, and consistent with Kretzschmar, Schlesewsky, and Staub (2015), no frequency effect was reflected in the FRP measures. The findings provide insight into the neural correlates of parafoveal processing and written word recognition in reading and demonstrate the value of utilizing ecologically valid paradigms to study well established phenomena that occur as text is read naturally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63886702019-02-27 Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials Degno, Federica Loberg, Otto Zang, Chuanli Zhang, Manman Donnelly, Nick Liversedge, Simon P. J Exp Psychol Gen Articles Participants’ eye movements and electroencephalogram (EEG) signal were recorded as they read sentences displayed according to the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. Two target words in each sentence were manipulated for lexical frequency (high vs. low frequency) and parafoveal preview of each target word (identical vs. string of random letters vs. string of Xs). Eye movement data revealed visual parafoveal-on-foveal (PoF) effects, as well as foveal visual and orthographic preview effects and word frequency effects. Fixation-related potentials (FRPs) showed visual and orthographic PoF effects as well as foveal visual and orthographic preview effects. Our results replicated the early preview positivity effect (Dimigen, Kliegl, & Sommer, 2012) in the X-string preview condition, and revealed different neural correlates associated with a preview comprised of a string of random letters relative to a string of Xs. The former effects seem likely to reflect difficulty associated with the integration of parafoveal and foveal information, as well as feature overlap, while the latter reflect inhibition, and potentially disruption, to processing underlying reading. Interestingly, and consistent with Kretzschmar, Schlesewsky, and Staub (2015), no frequency effect was reflected in the FRP measures. The findings provide insight into the neural correlates of parafoveal processing and written word recognition in reading and demonstrate the value of utilizing ecologically valid paradigms to study well established phenomena that occur as text is read naturally. American Psychological Association 2018-10-18 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6388670/ /pubmed/30335444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000494 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Articles
Degno, Federica
Loberg, Otto
Zang, Chuanli
Zhang, Manman
Donnelly, Nick
Liversedge, Simon P.
Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title_full Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title_fullStr Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title_short Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials
title_sort parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000494
work_keys_str_mv AT degnofederica parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials
AT lobergotto parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials
AT zangchuanli parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials
AT zhangmanman parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials
AT donnellynick parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials
AT liversedgesimonp parafovealpreviewsandlexicalfrequencyinnaturalreadingevidencefromeyemovementsandfixationrelatedpotentials