Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Reciprocating single-file systems are the latest nickel-titanium instruments and little information is available concerning the shaping ability of these new systems. Comparison of these single-file systems with well-known rotary multi-file systems is necessary. The purpose of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Guohua, Yang, Guobin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.09.005
_version_ 1783397836698681344
author Yuan, Guohua
Yang, Guobin
author_facet Yuan, Guohua
Yang, Guobin
author_sort Yuan, Guohua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Reciprocating single-file systems are the latest nickel-titanium instruments and little information is available concerning the shaping ability of these new systems. Comparison of these single-file systems with well-known rotary multi-file systems is necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of single-file system (WaveOne, WO) versus multiple-file system (ProTaper Next, PTN) in severely curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 severely curved canals were prepared with WO or PTN. Micro-computed tomography was used to scan the specimens before and after instrumentation. Differences between two groups in canal surface area, volume, Structure Model Index (SMI), thickness, straightening, the ratio of uninstrumented surface area and canal transportation were evaluated. RESULTS: The outline of the canals after preparation showed smooth taper in both groups. Canal surface area, volume, SMI, Thickness and canal curvature were significantly increased after preparation in both groups, and no significant difference was found between groups. At apical third, canals prepared with WO showed larger values of transportation compared with those in PTN group in the direction of main curvature. Approximately 29–34% of the root canal surface remained uninstrumented after preparation and no significant difference was noticed between groups. CONCLUSION: Both of the two instrument systems maintained the original outline of the canals well. The canals prepared with PTN had less transportation and were better centered in the apical region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6388865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63888652019-03-20 Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals Yuan, Guohua Yang, Guobin J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Reciprocating single-file systems are the latest nickel-titanium instruments and little information is available concerning the shaping ability of these new systems. Comparison of these single-file systems with well-known rotary multi-file systems is necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of single-file system (WaveOne, WO) versus multiple-file system (ProTaper Next, PTN) in severely curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 severely curved canals were prepared with WO or PTN. Micro-computed tomography was used to scan the specimens before and after instrumentation. Differences between two groups in canal surface area, volume, Structure Model Index (SMI), thickness, straightening, the ratio of uninstrumented surface area and canal transportation were evaluated. RESULTS: The outline of the canals after preparation showed smooth taper in both groups. Canal surface area, volume, SMI, Thickness and canal curvature were significantly increased after preparation in both groups, and no significant difference was found between groups. At apical third, canals prepared with WO showed larger values of transportation compared with those in PTN group in the direction of main curvature. Approximately 29–34% of the root canal surface remained uninstrumented after preparation and no significant difference was noticed between groups. CONCLUSION: Both of the two instrument systems maintained the original outline of the canals well. The canals prepared with PTN had less transportation and were better centered in the apical region. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2018-03 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6388865/ /pubmed/30895092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.09.005 Text en © 2018 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yuan, Guohua
Yang, Guobin
Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title_full Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title_short Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
title_sort comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanguohua comparativeevaluationoftheshapingabilityofsinglefilesystemversusmultifilesysteminseverelycurvedrootcanals
AT yangguobin comparativeevaluationoftheshapingabilityofsinglefilesystemversusmultifilesysteminseverelycurvedrootcanals