Cargando…
Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6 |
_version_ | 1783397926878314496 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaoqiang Kabolizadeh, Peyman Yan, Di Qin, An Zhou, Jun Hong, Ye Guerrero, Thomas Grills, Inga Stevens, Craig Ding, Xuanfeng |
author_facet | Li, Xiaoqiang Kabolizadeh, Peyman Yan, Di Qin, An Zhou, Jun Hong, Ye Guerrero, Thomas Grills, Inga Stevens, Craig Ding, Xuanfeng |
author_sort | Li, Xiaoqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Both SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V(20), and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST. CONCLUSIONS: This study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6389253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63892532019-03-19 Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy Li, Xiaoqiang Kabolizadeh, Peyman Yan, Di Qin, An Zhou, Jun Hong, Ye Guerrero, Thomas Grills, Inga Stevens, Craig Ding, Xuanfeng Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Both SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V(20), and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST. CONCLUSIONS: This study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice. BioMed Central 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6389253/ /pubmed/29486782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Xiaoqiang Kabolizadeh, Peyman Yan, Di Qin, An Zhou, Jun Hong, Ye Guerrero, Thomas Grills, Inga Stevens, Craig Ding, Xuanfeng Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title | Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title_full | Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title_fullStr | Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title_short | Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy |
title_sort | improve dosimetric outcome in stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (sparc) therapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaoqiang improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT kabolizadehpeyman improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT yandi improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT qinan improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT zhoujun improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT hongye improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT guerrerothomas improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT grillsinga improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT stevenscraig improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy AT dingxuanfeng improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy |