Cargando…

Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaoqiang, Kabolizadeh, Peyman, Yan, Di, Qin, An, Zhou, Jun, Hong, Ye, Guerrero, Thomas, Grills, Inga, Stevens, Craig, Ding, Xuanfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6
_version_ 1783397926878314496
author Li, Xiaoqiang
Kabolizadeh, Peyman
Yan, Di
Qin, An
Zhou, Jun
Hong, Ye
Guerrero, Thomas
Grills, Inga
Stevens, Craig
Ding, Xuanfeng
author_facet Li, Xiaoqiang
Kabolizadeh, Peyman
Yan, Di
Qin, An
Zhou, Jun
Hong, Ye
Guerrero, Thomas
Grills, Inga
Stevens, Craig
Ding, Xuanfeng
author_sort Li, Xiaoqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Both SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V(20), and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST. CONCLUSIONS: This study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63892532019-03-19 Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy Li, Xiaoqiang Kabolizadeh, Peyman Yan, Di Qin, An Zhou, Jun Hong, Ye Guerrero, Thomas Grills, Inga Stevens, Craig Ding, Xuanfeng Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Both SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V(20), and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST. CONCLUSIONS: This study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice. BioMed Central 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6389253/ /pubmed/29486782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Xiaoqiang
Kabolizadeh, Peyman
Yan, Di
Qin, An
Zhou, Jun
Hong, Ye
Guerrero, Thomas
Grills, Inga
Stevens, Craig
Ding, Xuanfeng
Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title_full Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title_fullStr Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title_full_unstemmed Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title_short Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy
title_sort improve dosimetric outcome in stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (sparc) therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaoqiang improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT kabolizadehpeyman improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT yandi improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT qinan improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT zhoujun improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT hongye improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT guerrerothomas improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT grillsinga improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT stevenscraig improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy
AT dingxuanfeng improvedosimetricoutcomeinstageiiinonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentusingspotscanningprotonarcsparctherapy