Cargando…
Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052 |
_version_ | 1783397951305940992 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Shintaro Sakaoka, Atsushi Ikuno, Eri Asou, Ryouhei Shimizu, Daiki Hagiwara, Hitomi |
author_facet | Nakamura, Shintaro Sakaoka, Atsushi Ikuno, Eri Asou, Ryouhei Shimizu, Daiki Hagiwara, Hitomi |
author_sort | Nakamura, Shintaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term retention in tissues without detachment or loss), and biocompatibility, as this has not yet been investigated. Thus, we aimed to determine the optimal implantation site. Two types of transponders were subcutaneously implanted into four different sites (ear base, ear auricle, ventral neck, and back) in 3 domestic swine each. The transponders were scanned at 1, 2, 3, and 84 days after implantation. The location of the transponders was examined by X-ray and echography at 84 days. Histopathological examinations were performed at 84 days. The transponders in the back were successfully scanned in a shorter time than those in other implantation sites, without any re-scanning procedures. X-ray examination revealed one transponder in the ventral neck was lost, whereas those in the other sites were retained in their original location for 84 days. Echography indicated that the transponders in the back were retained more deeply than those in other implantation sites, suggesting better retentionability. Acceptable biocompatibility was confirmed in all implantation sites, as evidenced by the finding that all transponders were covered by a connective tissue capsule without severe inflammation. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that the back is the optimal implantation site for transponders in experimental swine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6389517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63895172019-03-04 Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine Nakamura, Shintaro Sakaoka, Atsushi Ikuno, Eri Asou, Ryouhei Shimizu, Daiki Hagiwara, Hitomi Exp Anim Original Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term retention in tissues without detachment or loss), and biocompatibility, as this has not yet been investigated. Thus, we aimed to determine the optimal implantation site. Two types of transponders were subcutaneously implanted into four different sites (ear base, ear auricle, ventral neck, and back) in 3 domestic swine each. The transponders were scanned at 1, 2, 3, and 84 days after implantation. The location of the transponders was examined by X-ray and echography at 84 days. Histopathological examinations were performed at 84 days. The transponders in the back were successfully scanned in a shorter time than those in other implantation sites, without any re-scanning procedures. X-ray examination revealed one transponder in the ventral neck was lost, whereas those in the other sites were retained in their original location for 84 days. Echography indicated that the transponders in the back were retained more deeply than those in other implantation sites, suggesting better retentionability. Acceptable biocompatibility was confirmed in all implantation sites, as evidenced by the finding that all transponders were covered by a connective tissue capsule without severe inflammation. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that the back is the optimal implantation site for transponders in experimental swine. Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2018-08-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6389517/ /pubmed/30078789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052 Text en ©2019 Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Nakamura, Shintaro Sakaoka, Atsushi Ikuno, Eri Asou, Ryouhei Shimizu, Daiki Hagiwara, Hitomi Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine |
title | Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
title_full | Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
title_fullStr | Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
title_short | Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
title_sort | optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental
swine |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamurashintaro optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine AT sakaokaatsushi optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine AT ikunoeri optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine AT asouryouhei optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine AT shimizudaiki optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine AT hagiwarahitomi optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine |