Cargando…

Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine

Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Shintaro, Sakaoka, Atsushi, Ikuno, Eri, Asou, Ryouhei, Shimizu, Daiki, Hagiwara, Hitomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052
_version_ 1783397951305940992
author Nakamura, Shintaro
Sakaoka, Atsushi
Ikuno, Eri
Asou, Ryouhei
Shimizu, Daiki
Hagiwara, Hitomi
author_facet Nakamura, Shintaro
Sakaoka, Atsushi
Ikuno, Eri
Asou, Ryouhei
Shimizu, Daiki
Hagiwara, Hitomi
author_sort Nakamura, Shintaro
collection PubMed
description Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term retention in tissues without detachment or loss), and biocompatibility, as this has not yet been investigated. Thus, we aimed to determine the optimal implantation site. Two types of transponders were subcutaneously implanted into four different sites (ear base, ear auricle, ventral neck, and back) in 3 domestic swine each. The transponders were scanned at 1, 2, 3, and 84 days after implantation. The location of the transponders was examined by X-ray and echography at 84 days. Histopathological examinations were performed at 84 days. The transponders in the back were successfully scanned in a shorter time than those in other implantation sites, without any re-scanning procedures. X-ray examination revealed one transponder in the ventral neck was lost, whereas those in the other sites were retained in their original location for 84 days. Echography indicated that the transponders in the back were retained more deeply than those in other implantation sites, suggesting better retentionability. Acceptable biocompatibility was confirmed in all implantation sites, as evidenced by the finding that all transponders were covered by a connective tissue capsule without severe inflammation. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that the back is the optimal implantation site for transponders in experimental swine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63895172019-03-04 Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine Nakamura, Shintaro Sakaoka, Atsushi Ikuno, Eri Asou, Ryouhei Shimizu, Daiki Hagiwara, Hitomi Exp Anim Original Use of transponders, small electronic identification devices, in experimental swine is expected to be more reliable than the current common use of ear tags. However, it is necessary to determine the optimal implantation site for transponders with high readability, retentionability (i.e., long-term retention in tissues without detachment or loss), and biocompatibility, as this has not yet been investigated. Thus, we aimed to determine the optimal implantation site. Two types of transponders were subcutaneously implanted into four different sites (ear base, ear auricle, ventral neck, and back) in 3 domestic swine each. The transponders were scanned at 1, 2, 3, and 84 days after implantation. The location of the transponders was examined by X-ray and echography at 84 days. Histopathological examinations were performed at 84 days. The transponders in the back were successfully scanned in a shorter time than those in other implantation sites, without any re-scanning procedures. X-ray examination revealed one transponder in the ventral neck was lost, whereas those in the other sites were retained in their original location for 84 days. Echography indicated that the transponders in the back were retained more deeply than those in other implantation sites, suggesting better retentionability. Acceptable biocompatibility was confirmed in all implantation sites, as evidenced by the finding that all transponders were covered by a connective tissue capsule without severe inflammation. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that the back is the optimal implantation site for transponders in experimental swine. Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2018-08-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6389517/ /pubmed/30078789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052 Text en ©2019 Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original
Nakamura, Shintaro
Sakaoka, Atsushi
Ikuno, Eri
Asou, Ryouhei
Shimizu, Daiki
Hagiwara, Hitomi
Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title_full Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title_fullStr Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title_full_unstemmed Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title_short Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
title_sort optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.18-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurashintaro optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine
AT sakaokaatsushi optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine
AT ikunoeri optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine
AT asouryouhei optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine
AT shimizudaiki optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine
AT hagiwarahitomi optimalimplantationsiteoftranspondersforidentificationofexperimentalswine