Cargando…

Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the effects of single semitendinosus tendon (ST) harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing outcomes of single ST and semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) harvesting. METHODS: ACL reconstruction with ST-G harvesting (D group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Dhong Won, Shim, Jae Chan, Yang, Sang Jin, Cho, Seung Ik, Kim, Jin Goo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.60
_version_ 1783397956280385536
author Lee, Dhong Won
Shim, Jae Chan
Yang, Sang Jin
Cho, Seung Ik
Kim, Jin Goo
author_facet Lee, Dhong Won
Shim, Jae Chan
Yang, Sang Jin
Cho, Seung Ik
Kim, Jin Goo
author_sort Lee, Dhong Won
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the effects of single semitendinosus tendon (ST) harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing outcomes of single ST and semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) harvesting. METHODS: ACL reconstruction with ST-G harvesting (D group, n = 60) or single ST harvesting (S group, n = 60) were included according to inclusion criteria. Subjective assessments included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale score. Objective assessments included isokinetic strength and functional tests. These tests were completed at 36 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy findings were evaluated. In the S group, regeneration properties were assessed by serial ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: The S group showed significantly less deep flexor strength deficit than the D group (p < 0.001). Deep flexor power deficits showed significant correlation with the shift of musculotendinous junction of the ST. There was significant difference in the cocontraction test between the groups (p = 0.012), and the S group tended to show better results in other functional tests at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in graft tension and synovial coverage on second-look arthroscopy between the groups. In the S group, the regeneration rates assessed by US at the joint line and distal insertion were 81.7% and 80%, respectively at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The S group showed significantly less deficit in deep flexor strength and tended to show better clinical results at the last follow-up than the D group. In the S group, more than 80% showed good regeneration at the 6-month follow-up. Hence, single ST harvesting is effective in minimizing flexor weakness and functional deficits and shows great potential for regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63895382019-03-06 Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting Lee, Dhong Won Shim, Jae Chan Yang, Sang Jin Cho, Seung Ik Kim, Jin Goo Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the effects of single semitendinosus tendon (ST) harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing outcomes of single ST and semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) harvesting. METHODS: ACL reconstruction with ST-G harvesting (D group, n = 60) or single ST harvesting (S group, n = 60) were included according to inclusion criteria. Subjective assessments included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale score. Objective assessments included isokinetic strength and functional tests. These tests were completed at 36 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy findings were evaluated. In the S group, regeneration properties were assessed by serial ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: The S group showed significantly less deep flexor strength deficit than the D group (p < 0.001). Deep flexor power deficits showed significant correlation with the shift of musculotendinous junction of the ST. There was significant difference in the cocontraction test between the groups (p = 0.012), and the S group tended to show better results in other functional tests at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in graft tension and synovial coverage on second-look arthroscopy between the groups. In the S group, the regeneration rates assessed by US at the joint line and distal insertion were 81.7% and 80%, respectively at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The S group showed significantly less deficit in deep flexor strength and tended to show better clinical results at the last follow-up than the D group. In the S group, more than 80% showed good regeneration at the 6-month follow-up. Hence, single ST harvesting is effective in minimizing flexor weakness and functional deficits and shows great potential for regeneration. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-03 2019-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6389538/ /pubmed/30838109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.60 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Dhong Won
Shim, Jae Chan
Yang, Sang Jin
Cho, Seung Ik
Kim, Jin Goo
Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title_full Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title_fullStr Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title_full_unstemmed Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title_short Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting
title_sort functional effects of single semitendinosus tendon harvesting in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of single versus dual hamstring harvesting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.60
work_keys_str_mv AT leedhongwon functionaleffectsofsinglesemitendinosustendonharvestinginanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonofsingleversusdualhamstringharvesting
AT shimjaechan functionaleffectsofsinglesemitendinosustendonharvestinginanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonofsingleversusdualhamstringharvesting
AT yangsangjin functionaleffectsofsinglesemitendinosustendonharvestinginanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonofsingleversusdualhamstringharvesting
AT choseungik functionaleffectsofsinglesemitendinosustendonharvestinginanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonofsingleversusdualhamstringharvesting
AT kimjingoo functionaleffectsofsinglesemitendinosustendonharvestinginanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonofsingleversusdualhamstringharvesting