Cargando…

Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative in vivo measurement of brain amyloid burden is important for both research and clinical purposes. However, the existence of multiple imaging tracers presents challenges to the interpretation of such measurements. This study presents a direct comparison of Pittsburgh compou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Yi, Flores, Shaney, Wang, Guoqiao, Hornbeck, Russ C., Speidel, Benjamin, Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly, Vlassenko, Andrei G., Gordon, Brian A., Koeppe, Robert A., Klunk, William E., Jack, Clifford R., Farlow, Martin R., Salloway, Stephen, Snider, Barbara J., Berman, Sarah B., Roberson, Erik D., Brosch, Jared, Jimenez-Velazques, Ivonne, van Dyck, Christopher H., Galasko, Douglas, Yuan, Shauna H., Jayadev, Suman, Honig, Lawrence S., Gauthier, Serge, Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R., Masellis, Mario, Brooks, William S., Fulham, Michael, Clarnette, Roger, Masters, Colin L., Wallon, David, Hannequin, Didier, Dubois, Bruno, Pariente, Jeremie, Sanchez-Valle, Raquel, Mummery, Catherine, Ringman, John M., Bottlaender, Michel, Klein, Gregory, Milosavljevic-Ristic, Smiljana, McDade, Eric, Xiong, Chengjie, Morris, John C., Bateman, Randall J., Benzinger, Tammie L.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.008
_version_ 1783397990087524352
author Su, Yi
Flores, Shaney
Wang, Guoqiao
Hornbeck, Russ C.
Speidel, Benjamin
Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly
Vlassenko, Andrei G.
Gordon, Brian A.
Koeppe, Robert A.
Klunk, William E.
Jack, Clifford R.
Farlow, Martin R.
Salloway, Stephen
Snider, Barbara J.
Berman, Sarah B.
Roberson, Erik D.
Brosch, Jared
Jimenez-Velazques, Ivonne
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Galasko, Douglas
Yuan, Shauna H.
Jayadev, Suman
Honig, Lawrence S.
Gauthier, Serge
Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.
Masellis, Mario
Brooks, William S.
Fulham, Michael
Clarnette, Roger
Masters, Colin L.
Wallon, David
Hannequin, Didier
Dubois, Bruno
Pariente, Jeremie
Sanchez-Valle, Raquel
Mummery, Catherine
Ringman, John M.
Bottlaender, Michel
Klein, Gregory
Milosavljevic-Ristic, Smiljana
McDade, Eric
Xiong, Chengjie
Morris, John C.
Bateman, Randall J.
Benzinger, Tammie L.S.
author_facet Su, Yi
Flores, Shaney
Wang, Guoqiao
Hornbeck, Russ C.
Speidel, Benjamin
Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly
Vlassenko, Andrei G.
Gordon, Brian A.
Koeppe, Robert A.
Klunk, William E.
Jack, Clifford R.
Farlow, Martin R.
Salloway, Stephen
Snider, Barbara J.
Berman, Sarah B.
Roberson, Erik D.
Brosch, Jared
Jimenez-Velazques, Ivonne
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Galasko, Douglas
Yuan, Shauna H.
Jayadev, Suman
Honig, Lawrence S.
Gauthier, Serge
Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.
Masellis, Mario
Brooks, William S.
Fulham, Michael
Clarnette, Roger
Masters, Colin L.
Wallon, David
Hannequin, Didier
Dubois, Bruno
Pariente, Jeremie
Sanchez-Valle, Raquel
Mummery, Catherine
Ringman, John M.
Bottlaender, Michel
Klein, Gregory
Milosavljevic-Ristic, Smiljana
McDade, Eric
Xiong, Chengjie
Morris, John C.
Bateman, Randall J.
Benzinger, Tammie L.S.
author_sort Su, Yi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Quantitative in vivo measurement of brain amyloid burden is important for both research and clinical purposes. However, the existence of multiple imaging tracers presents challenges to the interpretation of such measurements. This study presents a direct comparison of Pittsburgh compound B–based and florbetapir-based amyloid imaging in the same participants from two independent cohorts using a crossover design. METHODS: Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir amyloid PET imaging data from three different cohorts were analyzed using previously established pipelines to obtain global amyloid burden measurements. These measurements were converted to the Centiloid scale to allow fair comparison between the two tracers. The mean and inter-individual variability of the two tracers were compared using multivariate linear models both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. RESULTS: Global amyloid burden measured using the two tracers were strongly correlated in both cohorts. However, higher variability was observed when florbetapir was used as the imaging tracer. The variability may be partially caused by white matter signal as partial volume correction reduces the variability and improves the correlations between the two tracers. Amyloid burden measured using both tracers was found to be in association with clinical and psychometric measurements. Longitudinal comparison of the two tracers was also performed in similar but separate cohorts whose baseline amyloid load was considered elevated (i.e., amyloid positive). No significant difference was detected in the average annualized rate of change measurements made with these two tracers. DISCUSSION: Although the amyloid burden measurements were quite similar using these two tracers as expected, difference was observable even after conversion into the Centiloid scale. Further investigation is warranted to identify optimal strategies to harmonize amyloid imaging data acquired using different tracers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63897272019-03-07 Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies Su, Yi Flores, Shaney Wang, Guoqiao Hornbeck, Russ C. Speidel, Benjamin Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly Vlassenko, Andrei G. Gordon, Brian A. Koeppe, Robert A. Klunk, William E. Jack, Clifford R. Farlow, Martin R. Salloway, Stephen Snider, Barbara J. Berman, Sarah B. Roberson, Erik D. Brosch, Jared Jimenez-Velazques, Ivonne van Dyck, Christopher H. Galasko, Douglas Yuan, Shauna H. Jayadev, Suman Honig, Lawrence S. Gauthier, Serge Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R. Masellis, Mario Brooks, William S. Fulham, Michael Clarnette, Roger Masters, Colin L. Wallon, David Hannequin, Didier Dubois, Bruno Pariente, Jeremie Sanchez-Valle, Raquel Mummery, Catherine Ringman, John M. Bottlaender, Michel Klein, Gregory Milosavljevic-Ristic, Smiljana McDade, Eric Xiong, Chengjie Morris, John C. Bateman, Randall J. Benzinger, Tammie L.S. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Neuroimaging INTRODUCTION: Quantitative in vivo measurement of brain amyloid burden is important for both research and clinical purposes. However, the existence of multiple imaging tracers presents challenges to the interpretation of such measurements. This study presents a direct comparison of Pittsburgh compound B–based and florbetapir-based amyloid imaging in the same participants from two independent cohorts using a crossover design. METHODS: Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir amyloid PET imaging data from three different cohorts were analyzed using previously established pipelines to obtain global amyloid burden measurements. These measurements were converted to the Centiloid scale to allow fair comparison between the two tracers. The mean and inter-individual variability of the two tracers were compared using multivariate linear models both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. RESULTS: Global amyloid burden measured using the two tracers were strongly correlated in both cohorts. However, higher variability was observed when florbetapir was used as the imaging tracer. The variability may be partially caused by white matter signal as partial volume correction reduces the variability and improves the correlations between the two tracers. Amyloid burden measured using both tracers was found to be in association with clinical and psychometric measurements. Longitudinal comparison of the two tracers was also performed in similar but separate cohorts whose baseline amyloid load was considered elevated (i.e., amyloid positive). No significant difference was detected in the average annualized rate of change measurements made with these two tracers. DISCUSSION: Although the amyloid burden measurements were quite similar using these two tracers as expected, difference was observable even after conversion into the Centiloid scale. Further investigation is warranted to identify optimal strategies to harmonize amyloid imaging data acquired using different tracers. Elsevier 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6389727/ /pubmed/30847382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.008 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Neuroimaging
Su, Yi
Flores, Shaney
Wang, Guoqiao
Hornbeck, Russ C.
Speidel, Benjamin
Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly
Vlassenko, Andrei G.
Gordon, Brian A.
Koeppe, Robert A.
Klunk, William E.
Jack, Clifford R.
Farlow, Martin R.
Salloway, Stephen
Snider, Barbara J.
Berman, Sarah B.
Roberson, Erik D.
Brosch, Jared
Jimenez-Velazques, Ivonne
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Galasko, Douglas
Yuan, Shauna H.
Jayadev, Suman
Honig, Lawrence S.
Gauthier, Serge
Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.
Masellis, Mario
Brooks, William S.
Fulham, Michael
Clarnette, Roger
Masters, Colin L.
Wallon, David
Hannequin, Didier
Dubois, Bruno
Pariente, Jeremie
Sanchez-Valle, Raquel
Mummery, Catherine
Ringman, John M.
Bottlaender, Michel
Klein, Gregory
Milosavljevic-Ristic, Smiljana
McDade, Eric
Xiong, Chengjie
Morris, John C.
Bateman, Randall J.
Benzinger, Tammie L.S.
Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title_full Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title_fullStr Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title_short Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
title_sort comparison of pittsburgh compound b and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
topic Neuroimaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.008
work_keys_str_mv AT suyi comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT floresshaney comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT wangguoqiao comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT hornbeckrussc comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT speidelbenjamin comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT josephmathurinnelly comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT vlassenkoandreig comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT gordonbriana comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT koepperoberta comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT klunkwilliame comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT jackcliffordr comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT farlowmartinr comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT sallowaystephen comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT sniderbarbaraj comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT bermansarahb comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT robersonerikd comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT broschjared comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT jimenezvelazquesivonne comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT vandyckchristopherh comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT galaskodouglas comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT yuanshaunah comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT jayadevsuman comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT honiglawrences comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT gauthierserge comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT hsiunggingyuekr comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT masellismario comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT brookswilliams comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT fulhammichael comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT clarnetteroger comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT masterscolinl comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT wallondavid comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT hannequindidier comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT duboisbruno comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT parientejeremie comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT sanchezvalleraquel comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT mummerycatherine comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT ringmanjohnm comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT bottlaendermichel comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT kleingregory comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT milosavljevicristicsmiljana comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT mcdadeeric comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT xiongchengjie comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT morrisjohnc comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT batemanrandallj comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies
AT benzingertammiels comparisonofpittsburghcompoundbandflorbetapirincrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudies