Cargando…

Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies

Mortality, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late onset sepsis (LOS) and feeding intolerance are significant issues for very preterm (< 32 weeks) and extremely preterm (< 28 weeks) infants. The complications of ≥ Stage II NEC [e.g. Resection of the gangrenous gut, survival with intestinal failu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri, Patole, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13357
_version_ 1783398012810166272
author Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri
Patole, Sanjay
author_facet Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri
Patole, Sanjay
author_sort Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri
collection PubMed
description Mortality, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late onset sepsis (LOS) and feeding intolerance are significant issues for very preterm (< 32 weeks) and extremely preterm (< 28 weeks) infants. The complications of ≥ Stage II NEC [e.g. Resection of the gangrenous gut, survival with intestinal failure, recurrent infections, prolonged hospital stay, and long‐term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI)] impose a significant health burden. LOS also carries significant burden including long‐term NDI due to adverse effects of inflammation on the preterm brain during the critical phase of development. Frequent stopping of feeds due to feeding intolerance is a significant iatrogenic contributor to postnatal growth failure in extremely preterm infants. Over 25 systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of RCTs (~12 000 participants) have reported that probiotics significantly reduce the risk of all‐cause mortality, NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS and feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Systematic reviews and meta‐analysis of non‐RCTs have also shown that the benefits after adopting probiotics as a standard prophylaxis for preterm infants are similar to those reported in RCTs. No intervention comes close to probiotics when it comes to significant reduction in death, NEC, LOS and feeding intolerance at a cost of less than a dollar a day irrespective of the setting and baseline incidence of NEC. The common controversies that are preventing the rapid uptake of probiotics for preterm infants are addressed in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63898432019-03-07 Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri Patole, Sanjay Microb Biotechnol Opinion Mortality, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late onset sepsis (LOS) and feeding intolerance are significant issues for very preterm (< 32 weeks) and extremely preterm (< 28 weeks) infants. The complications of ≥ Stage II NEC [e.g. Resection of the gangrenous gut, survival with intestinal failure, recurrent infections, prolonged hospital stay, and long‐term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI)] impose a significant health burden. LOS also carries significant burden including long‐term NDI due to adverse effects of inflammation on the preterm brain during the critical phase of development. Frequent stopping of feeds due to feeding intolerance is a significant iatrogenic contributor to postnatal growth failure in extremely preterm infants. Over 25 systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of RCTs (~12 000 participants) have reported that probiotics significantly reduce the risk of all‐cause mortality, NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS and feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Systematic reviews and meta‐analysis of non‐RCTs have also shown that the benefits after adopting probiotics as a standard prophylaxis for preterm infants are similar to those reported in RCTs. No intervention comes close to probiotics when it comes to significant reduction in death, NEC, LOS and feeding intolerance at a cost of less than a dollar a day irrespective of the setting and baseline incidence of NEC. The common controversies that are preventing the rapid uptake of probiotics for preterm infants are addressed in this paper. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6389843/ /pubmed/30637944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13357 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion
Athalye‐Jape, Gayatri
Patole, Sanjay
Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title_full Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title_fullStr Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title_short Probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
title_sort probiotics for preterm infants – time to end all controversies
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13357
work_keys_str_mv AT athalyejapegayatri probioticsforpreterminfantstimetoendallcontroversies
AT patolesanjay probioticsforpreterminfantstimetoendallcontroversies