Cargando…

Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study

Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mittal, Monica, Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj, Lim, Lee Nai, Hamoda, Haitham, Savvas, Mike, Narvekar, Nitish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215
_version_ 1783398069193146368
author Mittal, Monica
Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj
Lim, Lee Nai
Hamoda, Haitham
Savvas, Mike
Narvekar, Nitish
author_facet Mittal, Monica
Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj
Lim, Lee Nai
Hamoda, Haitham
Savvas, Mike
Narvekar, Nitish
author_sort Mittal, Monica
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-interventional retrospective observational cohort study looking at all consecutive ETs undertaken over a 5-year study period. The CPR was determined by a self-reported urinary home pregnancy test undertaken 16 days after oocyte retrieval. Results: The CPR did not differ between an experienced clinician (39%) and trainee (45%) for the first 50 (p=0.41) and last 50 (40.7% versus 42.7%) (p=0.81) ET procedures. The CPR for the individuals remained consistent with their peaks and troughs mirroring the overall success rate of the unit. This pattern continued when the data was further stratified for co-variables (age [≤37 years of age], catheter type [soft] and embryo quality [expanded blastocyst of grade ≥2]): CPRs for experienced clinicians was 65.7% (first 50 transfers) and 40.9% (last 50 transfers); CPR for trainees was 66.7% (first 50 transfers) and 53.6% (last 50 transfers); p=0.95 and p=0.37, respectively. The trainees, however, were more likely to use a stylet catheter with a 2-step transfer technique, with a cost over clinical implication. Furthermore, patients expressed a preference for an experienced clinician to perform their procedure, despite being informed that the grade of the clinician had no impact on the cycle outcome after an analysis of the unit’s data. Conclusion: The clinician's grade and duration of service have not been shown to significantly impact the outcome of the ART cycle. The findings, however, should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect the culture of training in the unit, where there is a strong emphasis on adequate direct and indirect supervision. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of work and outcomes is established in postgraduate medical education, with the exact number required to achieve clinical competence being dependent on the procedure and intensity of the workload.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63900832019-03-01 Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study Mittal, Monica Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj Lim, Lee Nai Hamoda, Haitham Savvas, Mike Narvekar, Nitish GMS J Med Educ Article Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-interventional retrospective observational cohort study looking at all consecutive ETs undertaken over a 5-year study period. The CPR was determined by a self-reported urinary home pregnancy test undertaken 16 days after oocyte retrieval. Results: The CPR did not differ between an experienced clinician (39%) and trainee (45%) for the first 50 (p=0.41) and last 50 (40.7% versus 42.7%) (p=0.81) ET procedures. The CPR for the individuals remained consistent with their peaks and troughs mirroring the overall success rate of the unit. This pattern continued when the data was further stratified for co-variables (age [≤37 years of age], catheter type [soft] and embryo quality [expanded blastocyst of grade ≥2]): CPRs for experienced clinicians was 65.7% (first 50 transfers) and 40.9% (last 50 transfers); CPR for trainees was 66.7% (first 50 transfers) and 53.6% (last 50 transfers); p=0.95 and p=0.37, respectively. The trainees, however, were more likely to use a stylet catheter with a 2-step transfer technique, with a cost over clinical implication. Furthermore, patients expressed a preference for an experienced clinician to perform their procedure, despite being informed that the grade of the clinician had no impact on the cycle outcome after an analysis of the unit’s data. Conclusion: The clinician's grade and duration of service have not been shown to significantly impact the outcome of the ART cycle. The findings, however, should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect the culture of training in the unit, where there is a strong emphasis on adequate direct and indirect supervision. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of work and outcomes is established in postgraduate medical education, with the exact number required to achieve clinical competence being dependent on the procedure and intensity of the workload. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6390083/ /pubmed/30828607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215 Text en Copyright © 2019 Mittal et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mittal, Monica
Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj
Lim, Lee Nai
Hamoda, Haitham
Savvas, Mike
Narvekar, Nitish
Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title_full Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title_fullStr Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title_short Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
title_sort is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? a 5-year observational cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215
work_keys_str_mv AT mittalmonica isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy
AT supramaniamprasannaraj isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy
AT limleenai isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy
AT hamodahaitham isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy
AT savvasmike isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy
AT narvekarnitish isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy