Cargando…
Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study
Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215 |
_version_ | 1783398069193146368 |
---|---|
author | Mittal, Monica Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj Lim, Lee Nai Hamoda, Haitham Savvas, Mike Narvekar, Nitish |
author_facet | Mittal, Monica Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj Lim, Lee Nai Hamoda, Haitham Savvas, Mike Narvekar, Nitish |
author_sort | Mittal, Monica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-interventional retrospective observational cohort study looking at all consecutive ETs undertaken over a 5-year study period. The CPR was determined by a self-reported urinary home pregnancy test undertaken 16 days after oocyte retrieval. Results: The CPR did not differ between an experienced clinician (39%) and trainee (45%) for the first 50 (p=0.41) and last 50 (40.7% versus 42.7%) (p=0.81) ET procedures. The CPR for the individuals remained consistent with their peaks and troughs mirroring the overall success rate of the unit. This pattern continued when the data was further stratified for co-variables (age [≤37 years of age], catheter type [soft] and embryo quality [expanded blastocyst of grade ≥2]): CPRs for experienced clinicians was 65.7% (first 50 transfers) and 40.9% (last 50 transfers); CPR for trainees was 66.7% (first 50 transfers) and 53.6% (last 50 transfers); p=0.95 and p=0.37, respectively. The trainees, however, were more likely to use a stylet catheter with a 2-step transfer technique, with a cost over clinical implication. Furthermore, patients expressed a preference for an experienced clinician to perform their procedure, despite being informed that the grade of the clinician had no impact on the cycle outcome after an analysis of the unit’s data. Conclusion: The clinician's grade and duration of service have not been shown to significantly impact the outcome of the ART cycle. The findings, however, should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect the culture of training in the unit, where there is a strong emphasis on adequate direct and indirect supervision. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of work and outcomes is established in postgraduate medical education, with the exact number required to achieve clinical competence being dependent on the procedure and intensity of the workload. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6390083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63900832019-03-01 Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study Mittal, Monica Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj Lim, Lee Nai Hamoda, Haitham Savvas, Mike Narvekar, Nitish GMS J Med Educ Article Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-interventional retrospective observational cohort study looking at all consecutive ETs undertaken over a 5-year study period. The CPR was determined by a self-reported urinary home pregnancy test undertaken 16 days after oocyte retrieval. Results: The CPR did not differ between an experienced clinician (39%) and trainee (45%) for the first 50 (p=0.41) and last 50 (40.7% versus 42.7%) (p=0.81) ET procedures. The CPR for the individuals remained consistent with their peaks and troughs mirroring the overall success rate of the unit. This pattern continued when the data was further stratified for co-variables (age [≤37 years of age], catheter type [soft] and embryo quality [expanded blastocyst of grade ≥2]): CPRs for experienced clinicians was 65.7% (first 50 transfers) and 40.9% (last 50 transfers); CPR for trainees was 66.7% (first 50 transfers) and 53.6% (last 50 transfers); p=0.95 and p=0.37, respectively. The trainees, however, were more likely to use a stylet catheter with a 2-step transfer technique, with a cost over clinical implication. Furthermore, patients expressed a preference for an experienced clinician to perform their procedure, despite being informed that the grade of the clinician had no impact on the cycle outcome after an analysis of the unit’s data. Conclusion: The clinician's grade and duration of service have not been shown to significantly impact the outcome of the ART cycle. The findings, however, should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect the culture of training in the unit, where there is a strong emphasis on adequate direct and indirect supervision. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of work and outcomes is established in postgraduate medical education, with the exact number required to achieve clinical competence being dependent on the procedure and intensity of the workload. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6390083/ /pubmed/30828607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215 Text en Copyright © 2019 Mittal et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Mittal, Monica Supramaniam, Prasanna Raj Lim, Lee Nai Hamoda, Haitham Savvas, Mike Narvekar, Nitish Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title | Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title_full | Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title_short | Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study |
title_sort | is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? a 5-year observational cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittalmonica isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy AT supramaniamprasannaraj isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy AT limleenai isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy AT hamodahaitham isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy AT savvasmike isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy AT narvekarnitish isthecliniciananindependentvariableinembryotransferoutcomesunderstandardizeddirectandindirectsupervisiona5yearobservationalcohortstudy |