Cargando…
Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Ph...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y |
_version_ | 1783398123526160384 |
---|---|
author | Hourfar, Jan Bister, Dirk Ludwig, Björn Kinzinger, Gero Lisson, Jörg Alexander |
author_facet | Hourfar, Jan Bister, Dirk Ludwig, Björn Kinzinger, Gero Lisson, Jörg Alexander |
author_sort | Hourfar, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Photographs of smiling female models were collected from a variety of printed advertisements and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each): 1 dental, 2 fashion and 3 orthodontics. Group 4 used female patient images from orthodontic textbooks, assuming an OHD of 0.5 mm between maxillary central and lateral incisors. OHD was assessed by measuring the incisor height on the photographs and using average values to establish height differences. RESULTS: The average maxillary central-to-lateral incisor OHD differences were 1.39 mm (dental literature), 1.34 mm (fashion advertisements), 1.23 mm (orthodontics) and 0.62 mm (orthodontic textbooks) respectively. The differences between the advertisement groups were not significant (P > 0.05), but for orthodontic textbooks they were (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advertisers seem to prefer greater maxillary central-to-lateral OHD compared to commonly used bracket placement protocols. Therefore, discussing OHD at start of treatment is recommended; modification of commonly used bracket placement protocols may be helpful to achieve desired aesthetic outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6390340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63903402019-03-19 Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? Hourfar, Jan Bister, Dirk Ludwig, Björn Kinzinger, Gero Lisson, Jörg Alexander Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Photographs of smiling female models were collected from a variety of printed advertisements and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each): 1 dental, 2 fashion and 3 orthodontics. Group 4 used female patient images from orthodontic textbooks, assuming an OHD of 0.5 mm between maxillary central and lateral incisors. OHD was assessed by measuring the incisor height on the photographs and using average values to establish height differences. RESULTS: The average maxillary central-to-lateral incisor OHD differences were 1.39 mm (dental literature), 1.34 mm (fashion advertisements), 1.23 mm (orthodontics) and 0.62 mm (orthodontic textbooks) respectively. The differences between the advertisement groups were not significant (P > 0.05), but for orthodontic textbooks they were (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advertisers seem to prefer greater maxillary central-to-lateral OHD compared to commonly used bracket placement protocols. Therefore, discussing OHD at start of treatment is recommended; modification of commonly used bracket placement protocols may be helpful to achieve desired aesthetic outcome. BioMed Central 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6390340/ /pubmed/30808372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hourfar, Jan Bister, Dirk Ludwig, Björn Kinzinger, Gero Lisson, Jörg Alexander Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title | Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title_full | Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title_fullStr | Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title_full_unstemmed | Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title_short | Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
title_sort | occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hourfarjan occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement AT bisterdirk occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement AT ludwigbjorn occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement AT kinzingergero occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement AT lissonjorgalexander occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement |