Cargando…

Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hourfar, Jan, Bister, Dirk, Ludwig, Björn, Kinzinger, Gero, Lisson, Jörg Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y
_version_ 1783398123526160384
author Hourfar, Jan
Bister, Dirk
Ludwig, Björn
Kinzinger, Gero
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
author_facet Hourfar, Jan
Bister, Dirk
Ludwig, Björn
Kinzinger, Gero
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
author_sort Hourfar, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Photographs of smiling female models were collected from a variety of printed advertisements and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each): 1 dental, 2 fashion and 3 orthodontics. Group 4 used female patient images from orthodontic textbooks, assuming an OHD of 0.5 mm between maxillary central and lateral incisors. OHD was assessed by measuring the incisor height on the photographs and using average values to establish height differences. RESULTS: The average maxillary central-to-lateral incisor OHD differences were 1.39 mm (dental literature), 1.34 mm (fashion advertisements), 1.23 mm (orthodontics) and 0.62 mm (orthodontic textbooks) respectively. The differences between the advertisement groups were not significant (P >  0.05), but for orthodontic textbooks they were (P <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advertisers seem to prefer greater maxillary central-to-lateral OHD compared to commonly used bracket placement protocols. Therefore, discussing OHD at start of treatment is recommended; modification of commonly used bracket placement protocols may be helpful to achieve desired aesthetic outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63903402019-03-19 Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement? Hourfar, Jan Bister, Dirk Ludwig, Björn Kinzinger, Gero Lisson, Jörg Alexander Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning. METHODS: Photographs of smiling female models were collected from a variety of printed advertisements and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each): 1 dental, 2 fashion and 3 orthodontics. Group 4 used female patient images from orthodontic textbooks, assuming an OHD of 0.5 mm between maxillary central and lateral incisors. OHD was assessed by measuring the incisor height on the photographs and using average values to establish height differences. RESULTS: The average maxillary central-to-lateral incisor OHD differences were 1.39 mm (dental literature), 1.34 mm (fashion advertisements), 1.23 mm (orthodontics) and 0.62 mm (orthodontic textbooks) respectively. The differences between the advertisement groups were not significant (P >  0.05), but for orthodontic textbooks they were (P <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advertisers seem to prefer greater maxillary central-to-lateral OHD compared to commonly used bracket placement protocols. Therefore, discussing OHD at start of treatment is recommended; modification of commonly used bracket placement protocols may be helpful to achieve desired aesthetic outcome. BioMed Central 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6390340/ /pubmed/30808372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hourfar, Jan
Bister, Dirk
Ludwig, Björn
Kinzinger, Gero
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title_full Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title_fullStr Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title_full_unstemmed Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title_short Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
title_sort occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hourfarjan occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement
AT bisterdirk occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement
AT ludwigbjorn occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement
AT kinzingergero occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement
AT lissonjorgalexander occlusalheightdifferencebetweenmaxillarycentralandlateralincisorsshouldaestheticperceptioninfluencebracketplacement