Cargando…

The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success

BACKGROUND: Mass rearing requires a large colony from which male individuals can be harvested for sterilization and release. Attention is needed when monitoring life parameters of the reared population, knowing that any variations within the target population would lead to mismatching between two po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazigo, Ernest, Kidima, Winifrida, Myamba, Joseph, Kweka, Eliningaya J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2691-4
_version_ 1783398127336685568
author Mazigo, Ernest
Kidima, Winifrida
Myamba, Joseph
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
author_facet Mazigo, Ernest
Kidima, Winifrida
Myamba, Joseph
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
author_sort Mazigo, Ernest
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass rearing requires a large colony from which male individuals can be harvested for sterilization and release. Attention is needed when monitoring life parameters of the reared population, knowing that any variations within the target population would lead to mismatching between two populations. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) egg storage on hatchability and life history traits. For each parameter, comparison was made between freshly laid and stored eggs in three densities (40, 80, 120 eggs). METHODS: Anopheles gambiae s.s. freshly laid eggs were collected from the Tropical Pesticide Research Institute (TPRI) insectary. Eggs to be stored were kept at − 20 °C for 10 min and then transferred to refrigerators at 4 °C for intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days. After respective storage days, the eggs were transferred from refrigerators to ambient temperature of (25 ± 2) °C for 24 h and then placed in incubators for 24 h. Thereafter eggs were hatched. The egg hatchability, emerged larvae development, larvae survival and emerged adult sex ratios were monitored. RESULTS: This study found that hatching rates decreased with increase in storage time. The difference was significant in eggs stored for 10 and 15 days (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in hatching rates between An. gambiae eggs stored for 5 days and freshly hatched eggs (P > 0.05). Anopheles larvae development (L1 to pupae) was not significantly affected by storage time across all hatching densities. The study also found that larvae survival decreased with increase in egg storage time. However, there was no significant difference between larvae from freshly hatched eggs and those from eggs at 5 and 10 storage days (P > 0.05) but not for eggs stored for 15 days. Furthermore, there was a decrease in emerged adult males and increase in females relative to increased time of egg storage. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) at 15 storage days but not for eggs stored for 5 and 10 days (in triplicate densities). CONCLUSION: From this study it was concluded that storing An. gambiae eggs at 4 °C and 48 ± 2% relative humidity (RH) for 5 days is the optimal condition and time that did not affect egg hatching rates, larval development and survivorship and emerged adult mosquito sex ratio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63903562019-03-19 The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success Mazigo, Ernest Kidima, Winifrida Myamba, Joseph Kweka, Eliningaya J. Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Mass rearing requires a large colony from which male individuals can be harvested for sterilization and release. Attention is needed when monitoring life parameters of the reared population, knowing that any variations within the target population would lead to mismatching between two populations. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) egg storage on hatchability and life history traits. For each parameter, comparison was made between freshly laid and stored eggs in three densities (40, 80, 120 eggs). METHODS: Anopheles gambiae s.s. freshly laid eggs were collected from the Tropical Pesticide Research Institute (TPRI) insectary. Eggs to be stored were kept at − 20 °C for 10 min and then transferred to refrigerators at 4 °C for intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days. After respective storage days, the eggs were transferred from refrigerators to ambient temperature of (25 ± 2) °C for 24 h and then placed in incubators for 24 h. Thereafter eggs were hatched. The egg hatchability, emerged larvae development, larvae survival and emerged adult sex ratios were monitored. RESULTS: This study found that hatching rates decreased with increase in storage time. The difference was significant in eggs stored for 10 and 15 days (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in hatching rates between An. gambiae eggs stored for 5 days and freshly hatched eggs (P > 0.05). Anopheles larvae development (L1 to pupae) was not significantly affected by storage time across all hatching densities. The study also found that larvae survival decreased with increase in egg storage time. However, there was no significant difference between larvae from freshly hatched eggs and those from eggs at 5 and 10 storage days (P > 0.05) but not for eggs stored for 15 days. Furthermore, there was a decrease in emerged adult males and increase in females relative to increased time of egg storage. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) at 15 storage days but not for eggs stored for 5 and 10 days (in triplicate densities). CONCLUSION: From this study it was concluded that storing An. gambiae eggs at 4 °C and 48 ± 2% relative humidity (RH) for 5 days is the optimal condition and time that did not affect egg hatching rates, larval development and survivorship and emerged adult mosquito sex ratio. BioMed Central 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6390356/ /pubmed/30808356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2691-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Mazigo, Ernest
Kidima, Winifrida
Myamba, Joseph
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title_full The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title_fullStr The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title_full_unstemmed The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title_short The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
title_sort impact of anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2691-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mazigoernest theimpactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT kidimawinifrida theimpactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT myambajoseph theimpactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT kwekaeliningayaj theimpactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT mazigoernest impactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT kidimawinifrida impactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT myambajoseph impactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess
AT kwekaeliningayaj impactofanophelesgambiaeeggstorageformassrearingandproductionsuccess