Cargando…

Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure

A robust biomedical informatics infrastructure is essential for academic health centers engaged in translational research. There are no templates for what such an infrastructure encompasses or how it is funded. An informatics workgroup within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards network con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obeid, Jihad S., Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter, Harris, Paul A., Barnett, William K., Anderson, Nicholas R., Embi, Peter J., Hogan, William R., Bell, Douglas S., McIntosh, Leslie D., Knosp, Boyd, Tachinardi, Umberto, Cimino, James J., Wehbe, Firas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.332
_version_ 1783398137357926400
author Obeid, Jihad S.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Harris, Paul A.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
Hogan, William R.
Bell, Douglas S.
McIntosh, Leslie D.
Knosp, Boyd
Tachinardi, Umberto
Cimino, James J.
Wehbe, Firas H.
author_facet Obeid, Jihad S.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Harris, Paul A.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
Hogan, William R.
Bell, Douglas S.
McIntosh, Leslie D.
Knosp, Boyd
Tachinardi, Umberto
Cimino, James J.
Wehbe, Firas H.
author_sort Obeid, Jihad S.
collection PubMed
description A robust biomedical informatics infrastructure is essential for academic health centers engaged in translational research. There are no templates for what such an infrastructure encompasses or how it is funded. An informatics workgroup within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards network conducted an analysis to identify the scope, governance, and funding of this infrastructure. After we identified the essential components of an informatics infrastructure, we surveyed informatics leaders at network institutions about the governance and sustainability of the different components. Results from 42 survey respondents showed significant variations in governance and sustainability; however, some trends also emerged. Core informatics components such as electronic data capture systems, electronic health records data repositories, and related tools had mixed models of funding including, fee-for-service, extramural grants, and institutional support. Several key components such as regulatory systems (e.g., electronic Institutional Review Board [IRB] systems, grants, and contracts), security systems, data warehouses, and clinical trials management systems were overwhelmingly supported as institutional infrastructure. The findings highlighted in this report are worth noting for academic health centers and funding agencies involved in planning current and future informatics infrastructure, which provides the foundation for a robust, data-driven clinical and translational research program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63904012019-03-01 Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure Obeid, Jihad S. Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter Harris, Paul A. Barnett, William K. Anderson, Nicholas R. Embi, Peter J. Hogan, William R. Bell, Douglas S. McIntosh, Leslie D. Knosp, Boyd Tachinardi, Umberto Cimino, James J. Wehbe, Firas H. J Clin Transl Sci Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement A robust biomedical informatics infrastructure is essential for academic health centers engaged in translational research. There are no templates for what such an infrastructure encompasses or how it is funded. An informatics workgroup within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards network conducted an analysis to identify the scope, governance, and funding of this infrastructure. After we identified the essential components of an informatics infrastructure, we surveyed informatics leaders at network institutions about the governance and sustainability of the different components. Results from 42 survey respondents showed significant variations in governance and sustainability; however, some trends also emerged. Core informatics components such as electronic data capture systems, electronic health records data repositories, and related tools had mixed models of funding including, fee-for-service, extramural grants, and institutional support. Several key components such as regulatory systems (e.g., electronic Institutional Review Board [IRB] systems, grants, and contracts), security systems, data warehouses, and clinical trials management systems were overwhelmingly supported as institutional infrastructure. The findings highlighted in this report are worth noting for academic health centers and funding agencies involved in planning current and future informatics infrastructure, which provides the foundation for a robust, data-driven clinical and translational research program. Cambridge University Press 2018-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6390401/ /pubmed/30828467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.332 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement
Obeid, Jihad S.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Harris, Paul A.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
Hogan, William R.
Bell, Douglas S.
McIntosh, Leslie D.
Knosp, Boyd
Tachinardi, Umberto
Cimino, James J.
Wehbe, Firas H.
Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title_full Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title_fullStr Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title_short Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
title_sort sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
topic Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.332
work_keys_str_mv AT obeidjihads sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT tarczyhornochpeter sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT harrispaula sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT barnettwilliamk sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT andersonnicholasr sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT embipeterj sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT hoganwilliamr sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT belldouglass sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT mcintoshleslied sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT knospboyd sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT tachinardiumberto sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT ciminojamesj sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure
AT wehbefirash sustainabilityconsiderationsforclinicalandtranslationalresearchinformaticsinfrastructure