Cargando…

Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation

This paper proposes the creation and application of maturity models to guide institutional strategic investment in research informatics and information technology (research IT) and to provide the ability to measure readiness for clinical and research infrastructure as well as sustainability of exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knosp, Boyd M., Barnett, William K., Anderson, Nicholas R., Embi, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.339
_version_ 1783398137808814080
author Knosp, Boyd M.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
author_facet Knosp, Boyd M.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
author_sort Knosp, Boyd M.
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes the creation and application of maturity models to guide institutional strategic investment in research informatics and information technology (research IT) and to provide the ability to measure readiness for clinical and research infrastructure as well as sustainability of expertise. Conducting effective and efficient research in health science increasingly relies upon robust research IT systems and capabilities. Academic health centers are increasing investments in health IT systems to address operational pressures, including rapidly growing data, technological advances, and increasing security and regulatory challenges associated with data access requirements. Current approaches for planning and investment in research IT infrastructure vary across institutions and lack comparable guidance for evaluating investments, resulting in inconsistent approaches to research IT implementation across peer academic health centers as well as uncertainty in linking research IT investments to institutional goals. Maturity models address these issues through coupling the assessment of current organizational state with readiness for deployment of potential research IT investment, which can inform leadership strategy. Pilot work in maturity model development has ranged from using them as a catalyst for engaging medical school IT leaders in planning at a single institution to developing initial maturity indices that have been applied and refined across peer medical schools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63904032019-03-01 Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation Knosp, Boyd M. Barnett, William K. Anderson, Nicholas R. Embi, Peter J. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications This paper proposes the creation and application of maturity models to guide institutional strategic investment in research informatics and information technology (research IT) and to provide the ability to measure readiness for clinical and research infrastructure as well as sustainability of expertise. Conducting effective and efficient research in health science increasingly relies upon robust research IT systems and capabilities. Academic health centers are increasing investments in health IT systems to address operational pressures, including rapidly growing data, technological advances, and increasing security and regulatory challenges associated with data access requirements. Current approaches for planning and investment in research IT infrastructure vary across institutions and lack comparable guidance for evaluating investments, resulting in inconsistent approaches to research IT implementation across peer academic health centers as well as uncertainty in linking research IT investments to institutional goals. Maturity models address these issues through coupling the assessment of current organizational state with readiness for deployment of potential research IT investment, which can inform leadership strategy. Pilot work in maturity model development has ranged from using them as a catalyst for engaging medical school IT leaders in planning at a single institution to developing initial maturity indices that have been applied and refined across peer medical schools. Cambridge University Press 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6390403/ /pubmed/30828469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.339 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Knosp, Boyd M.
Barnett, William K.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Embi, Peter J.
Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title_full Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title_fullStr Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title_short Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
title_sort research it maturity models for academic health centers: early development and initial evaluation
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.339
work_keys_str_mv AT knospboydm researchitmaturitymodelsforacademichealthcentersearlydevelopmentandinitialevaluation
AT barnettwilliamk researchitmaturitymodelsforacademichealthcentersearlydevelopmentandinitialevaluation
AT andersonnicholasr researchitmaturitymodelsforacademichealthcentersearlydevelopmentandinitialevaluation
AT embipeterj researchitmaturitymodelsforacademichealthcentersearlydevelopmentandinitialevaluation