Cargando…

Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the beliefs of people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) about the disease, and how these beliefs had formed and what impact these beliefs had on activity participation, health behaviour, and self-management. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darlow, Ben, Brown, Melanie, Thompson, Bronwyn, Hudson, Ben, Grainger, Rebecca, McKinlay, Eileen, Abbott, J. Haxby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0023-x
_version_ 1783398160945643520
author Darlow, Ben
Brown, Melanie
Thompson, Bronwyn
Hudson, Ben
Grainger, Rebecca
McKinlay, Eileen
Abbott, J. Haxby
author_facet Darlow, Ben
Brown, Melanie
Thompson, Bronwyn
Hudson, Ben
Grainger, Rebecca
McKinlay, Eileen
Abbott, J. Haxby
author_sort Darlow, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the beliefs of people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) about the disease, and how these beliefs had formed and what impact these beliefs had on activity participation, health behaviour, and self-management. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 people with knee OA recruited from general practices, community physiotherapy clinics, and public advertisements in two provinces of New Zealand. Data were analysed using Interpretive Description. RESULTS: Two key themes emerged. 1) Knowledge: certainty and uncertainty described participants’ strong beliefs about anatomical changes in their knee. Participants’ beliefs in a biomechanical model of progressive joint degradation often appeared to originate within clinical encounters and from literal interpretation of the term ‘wear and tear’. These beliefs led to uncertainty regarding interpretation of daily symptoms and participants’ ability to influence the rate of decline and certainty that joint replacement surgery represented the only effective solution to fix the damaged knee. 2) Living with OA described broader perspectives of living with OA and the perceived need to balance competing values and risks when making decisions about activity participation, medication, attentional focus, accessing care, and making the most of today without sabotaging tomorrow. Misunderstandings about knee OA negatively impacted on activity participation, health behaviours, and self-management decisions. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical models of OA reduced participant exploration of management options and underpinned a perceived need to balance competing values. Improved information provision to people with knee OA could help guide positive health behaviour and self-management decisions and ensure these decisions are grounded in current evidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-018-0023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63905522019-03-18 Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain Darlow, Ben Brown, Melanie Thompson, Bronwyn Hudson, Ben Grainger, Rebecca McKinlay, Eileen Abbott, J. Haxby BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the beliefs of people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) about the disease, and how these beliefs had formed and what impact these beliefs had on activity participation, health behaviour, and self-management. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 people with knee OA recruited from general practices, community physiotherapy clinics, and public advertisements in two provinces of New Zealand. Data were analysed using Interpretive Description. RESULTS: Two key themes emerged. 1) Knowledge: certainty and uncertainty described participants’ strong beliefs about anatomical changes in their knee. Participants’ beliefs in a biomechanical model of progressive joint degradation often appeared to originate within clinical encounters and from literal interpretation of the term ‘wear and tear’. These beliefs led to uncertainty regarding interpretation of daily symptoms and participants’ ability to influence the rate of decline and certainty that joint replacement surgery represented the only effective solution to fix the damaged knee. 2) Living with OA described broader perspectives of living with OA and the perceived need to balance competing values and risks when making decisions about activity participation, medication, attentional focus, accessing care, and making the most of today without sabotaging tomorrow. Misunderstandings about knee OA negatively impacted on activity participation, health behaviours, and self-management decisions. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical models of OA reduced participant exploration of management options and underpinned a perceived need to balance competing values. Improved information provision to people with knee OA could help guide positive health behaviour and self-management decisions and ensure these decisions are grounded in current evidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-018-0023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6390552/ /pubmed/30886966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0023-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Darlow, Ben
Brown, Melanie
Thompson, Bronwyn
Hudson, Ben
Grainger, Rebecca
McKinlay, Eileen
Abbott, J. Haxby
Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title_full Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title_fullStr Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title_full_unstemmed Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title_short Living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
title_sort living with osteoarthritis is a balancing act: an exploration of patients’ beliefs about knee pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0023-x
work_keys_str_mv AT darlowben livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT brownmelanie livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT thompsonbronwyn livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT hudsonben livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT graingerrebecca livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT mckinlayeileen livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain
AT abbottjhaxby livingwithosteoarthritisisabalancingactanexplorationofpatientsbeliefsaboutkneepain