Cargando…

Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry

BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steunebrink, Laura M. M., Versteeg, Letty G. A., Vonkeman, Harald E., ten Klooster, Peter M., Hoekstra, Monique, van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8
_version_ 1783398209181188096
author Steunebrink, Laura M. M.
Versteeg, Letty G. A.
Vonkeman, Harald E.
ten Klooster, Peter M.
Hoekstra, Monique
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
author_facet Steunebrink, Laura M. M.
Versteeg, Letty G. A.
Vonkeman, Harald E.
ten Klooster, Peter M.
Hoekstra, Monique
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
author_sort Steunebrink, Laura M. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare the first-year radiographic progression rates between a treat-to-target (T2 T) strategy with initial combination therapy (strategy II, started in 2012) versus an initial step-up monotherapy (strategy I, started in 2006). METHODS: A total of 128 patients from strategy II was individually matched with 128 patients from strategy I on sex, age (± 5 yrs.) and baseline disease activity (± 0.5 on the DAS28). Differences in radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde) scores (SHS) and the number of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 5 SHS points) between both strategies were tested with Mann Whitney U and chi-square tests. Next, linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine which baseline variables were associated with radiographic progression scores and the probability of experiencing an MCID within 1 year. RESULTS: Patients with initial combination therapy had slightly higher baseline disease activity scores and pain scores, but better mental health scores. Patients with initial monotherapy had significantly more, and more frequently clinically relevant, radiographic progression after 1 year. Experiencing a MCID was independently associated with fewer tender joints (p = 0.050) and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.015) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treating early RA patients with initial combination therapy results in better radiographic outcomes than initial monotherapy in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR578, 12 January 2006.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63907782019-03-18 Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry Steunebrink, Laura M. M. Versteeg, Letty G. A. Vonkeman, Harald E. ten Klooster, Peter M. Hoekstra, Monique van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare the first-year radiographic progression rates between a treat-to-target (T2 T) strategy with initial combination therapy (strategy II, started in 2012) versus an initial step-up monotherapy (strategy I, started in 2006). METHODS: A total of 128 patients from strategy II was individually matched with 128 patients from strategy I on sex, age (± 5 yrs.) and baseline disease activity (± 0.5 on the DAS28). Differences in radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde) scores (SHS) and the number of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 5 SHS points) between both strategies were tested with Mann Whitney U and chi-square tests. Next, linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine which baseline variables were associated with radiographic progression scores and the probability of experiencing an MCID within 1 year. RESULTS: Patients with initial combination therapy had slightly higher baseline disease activity scores and pain scores, but better mental health scores. Patients with initial monotherapy had significantly more, and more frequently clinically relevant, radiographic progression after 1 year. Experiencing a MCID was independently associated with fewer tender joints (p = 0.050) and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.015) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treating early RA patients with initial combination therapy results in better radiographic outcomes than initial monotherapy in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR578, 12 January 2006. BioMed Central 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6390778/ /pubmed/30886952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steunebrink, Laura M. M.
Versteeg, Letty G. A.
Vonkeman, Harald E.
ten Klooster, Peter M.
Hoekstra, Monique
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title_full Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title_fullStr Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title_short Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
title_sort radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the dream registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8
work_keys_str_mv AT steunebrinklauramm radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry
AT versteeglettyga radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry
AT vonkemanharalde radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry
AT tenkloosterpeterm radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry
AT hoekstramonique radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry
AT vandelaarmartafj radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry