Cargando…
Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry
BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8 |
_version_ | 1783398209181188096 |
---|---|
author | Steunebrink, Laura M. M. Versteeg, Letty G. A. Vonkeman, Harald E. ten Klooster, Peter M. Hoekstra, Monique van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. |
author_facet | Steunebrink, Laura M. M. Versteeg, Letty G. A. Vonkeman, Harald E. ten Klooster, Peter M. Hoekstra, Monique van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. |
author_sort | Steunebrink, Laura M. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare the first-year radiographic progression rates between a treat-to-target (T2 T) strategy with initial combination therapy (strategy II, started in 2012) versus an initial step-up monotherapy (strategy I, started in 2006). METHODS: A total of 128 patients from strategy II was individually matched with 128 patients from strategy I on sex, age (± 5 yrs.) and baseline disease activity (± 0.5 on the DAS28). Differences in radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde) scores (SHS) and the number of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 5 SHS points) between both strategies were tested with Mann Whitney U and chi-square tests. Next, linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine which baseline variables were associated with radiographic progression scores and the probability of experiencing an MCID within 1 year. RESULTS: Patients with initial combination therapy had slightly higher baseline disease activity scores and pain scores, but better mental health scores. Patients with initial monotherapy had significantly more, and more frequently clinically relevant, radiographic progression after 1 year. Experiencing a MCID was independently associated with fewer tender joints (p = 0.050) and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.015) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treating early RA patients with initial combination therapy results in better radiographic outcomes than initial monotherapy in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR578, 12 January 2006. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6390778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63907782019-03-18 Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry Steunebrink, Laura M. M. Versteeg, Letty G. A. Vonkeman, Harald E. ten Klooster, Peter M. Hoekstra, Monique van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: Early and intensive targeted treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to lead to substantial reductions in disease activity and radiograph damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to compare the first-year radiographic progression rates between a treat-to-target (T2 T) strategy with initial combination therapy (strategy II, started in 2012) versus an initial step-up monotherapy (strategy I, started in 2006). METHODS: A total of 128 patients from strategy II was individually matched with 128 patients from strategy I on sex, age (± 5 yrs.) and baseline disease activity (± 0.5 on the DAS28). Differences in radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde) scores (SHS) and the number of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 5 SHS points) between both strategies were tested with Mann Whitney U and chi-square tests. Next, linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine which baseline variables were associated with radiographic progression scores and the probability of experiencing an MCID within 1 year. RESULTS: Patients with initial combination therapy had slightly higher baseline disease activity scores and pain scores, but better mental health scores. Patients with initial monotherapy had significantly more, and more frequently clinically relevant, radiographic progression after 1 year. Experiencing a MCID was independently associated with fewer tender joints (p = 0.050) and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.015) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treating early RA patients with initial combination therapy results in better radiographic outcomes than initial monotherapy in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR578, 12 January 2006. BioMed Central 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6390778/ /pubmed/30886952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steunebrink, Laura M. M. Versteeg, Letty G. A. Vonkeman, Harald E. ten Klooster, Peter M. Hoekstra, Monique van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title | Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title_full | Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title_fullStr | Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title_short | Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the DREAM registry |
title_sort | radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients following initial combination versus step-up treat-to-target therapy in daily clinical practice: results from the dream registry |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-018-0009-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steunebrinklauramm radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry AT versteeglettyga radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry AT vonkemanharalde radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry AT tenkloosterpeterm radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry AT hoekstramonique radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry AT vandelaarmartafj radiographicprogressioninearlyrheumatoidarthritispatientsfollowinginitialcombinationversusstepuptreattotargettherapyindailyclinicalpracticeresultsfromthedreamregistry |