Cargando…

Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason

The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Binns, Reuben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5
_version_ 1783398225162534912
author Binns, Reuben
author_facet Binns, Reuben
author_sort Binns, Reuben
collection PubMed
description The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of ‘public reason’. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6390894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63908942019-03-12 Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason Binns, Reuben Philos Technol Research Article The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of ‘public reason’. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them. Springer Netherlands 2017-05-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6390894/ /pubmed/30873342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Binns, Reuben
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title_full Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title_fullStr Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title_short Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
title_sort algorithmic accountability and public reason
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5
work_keys_str_mv AT binnsreuben algorithmicaccountabilityandpublicreason