Cargando…
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader pri...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 |
_version_ | 1783398225162534912 |
---|---|
author | Binns, Reuben |
author_facet | Binns, Reuben |
author_sort | Binns, Reuben |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of ‘public reason’. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6390894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63908942019-03-12 Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason Binns, Reuben Philos Technol Research Article The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of ‘public reason’. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them. Springer Netherlands 2017-05-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6390894/ /pubmed/30873342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Binns, Reuben Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title | Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title_full | Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title_fullStr | Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title_full_unstemmed | Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title_short | Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason |
title_sort | algorithmic accountability and public reason |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binnsreuben algorithmicaccountabilityandpublicreason |