Cargando…

Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients

This study looked at different methods to preserve interaural level difference (ILD) cues for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) recipients. One possible distortion to ILD is from automatic gain control (AGC). Localization accuracy of BiCI recipients using default versus increased AGC threshold and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potts, Wendy B., Ramanna, Lakshmish, Perry, Trevor, Long, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6391546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519831492
_version_ 1783398332556640256
author Potts, Wendy B.
Ramanna, Lakshmish
Perry, Trevor
Long, Christopher J.
author_facet Potts, Wendy B.
Ramanna, Lakshmish
Perry, Trevor
Long, Christopher J.
author_sort Potts, Wendy B.
collection PubMed
description This study looked at different methods to preserve interaural level difference (ILD) cues for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) recipients. One possible distortion to ILD is from automatic gain control (AGC). Localization accuracy of BiCI recipients using default versus increased AGC threshold and linked AGCs versus independent AGCs was examined. In addition, speech reception in noise was assessed using linked versus independent AGCs and enabling and disabling Autosensitivity™ Control. Subjective information via a diary and questionnaire was also collected about maps with linked and independent AGCs during a take-home experience. Localization accuracy improved in the increased AGC threshold and the linked AGCs conditions. Increasing the AGC threshold resulted in a 4° improvement in root mean square error averaged across all speaker locations. Using linked AGCs, BiCI participants experienced an 8° improvement for all speaker locations and a 19° improvement at the speaker location most affected by the AGC. Speech reception threshold in noise improved by an average of 2.5 dB when using linked AGCs versus independent AGCs. In addition, the effect of linked AGCs on speech in noise was compared with that of Autosensitivity™ Control. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale-12 question comparative survey showed an improvement when using maps with linked AGCs. These findings support the hypothesis that ILD cues may be preserved by increasing the AGC threshold or linking AGCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6391546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63915462019-03-04 Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Potts, Wendy B. Ramanna, Lakshmish Perry, Trevor Long, Christopher J. Trends Hear Original Article This study looked at different methods to preserve interaural level difference (ILD) cues for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) recipients. One possible distortion to ILD is from automatic gain control (AGC). Localization accuracy of BiCI recipients using default versus increased AGC threshold and linked AGCs versus independent AGCs was examined. In addition, speech reception in noise was assessed using linked versus independent AGCs and enabling and disabling Autosensitivity™ Control. Subjective information via a diary and questionnaire was also collected about maps with linked and independent AGCs during a take-home experience. Localization accuracy improved in the increased AGC threshold and the linked AGCs conditions. Increasing the AGC threshold resulted in a 4° improvement in root mean square error averaged across all speaker locations. Using linked AGCs, BiCI participants experienced an 8° improvement for all speaker locations and a 19° improvement at the speaker location most affected by the AGC. Speech reception threshold in noise improved by an average of 2.5 dB when using linked AGCs versus independent AGCs. In addition, the effect of linked AGCs on speech in noise was compared with that of Autosensitivity™ Control. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale-12 question comparative survey showed an improvement when using maps with linked AGCs. These findings support the hypothesis that ILD cues may be preserved by increasing the AGC threshold or linking AGCs. SAGE Publications 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6391546/ /pubmed/30791832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519831492 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Potts, Wendy B.
Ramanna, Lakshmish
Perry, Trevor
Long, Christopher J.
Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title_full Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title_fullStr Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title_full_unstemmed Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title_short Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
title_sort improving localization and speech reception in noise for bilateral cochlear implant recipients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6391546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519831492
work_keys_str_mv AT pottswendyb improvinglocalizationandspeechreceptioninnoiseforbilateralcochlearimplantrecipients
AT ramannalakshmish improvinglocalizationandspeechreceptioninnoiseforbilateralcochlearimplantrecipients
AT perrytrevor improvinglocalizationandspeechreceptioninnoiseforbilateralcochlearimplantrecipients
AT longchristopherj improvinglocalizationandspeechreceptioninnoiseforbilateralcochlearimplantrecipients