Cargando…

Investigating heartbeat-related in-plane motion and stress levels induced at the aortic root

BACKGROUND: The axial motion of aortic root (AR) due to ventricular traction was previously suggested to contribute to ascending aorta (AA) dissection by increasing its longitudinal stress, but AR in-plane motion effects on stresses have never been studied. The objective is to investigate the contri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Wei, Evin, Morgane, Rapacchi, Stanislas, Kober, Frank, Bernard, Monique, Jacquier, Alexis, Kahn, Cyril J. F., Behr, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6391796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0632-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The axial motion of aortic root (AR) due to ventricular traction was previously suggested to contribute to ascending aorta (AA) dissection by increasing its longitudinal stress, but AR in-plane motion effects on stresses have never been studied. The objective is to investigate the contribution of AR in-plane motion to AA stress levels. METHODS: The AR in-plane motion was assessed on magnetic resonance imagining data from 25 healthy volunteers as the movement of the AA section centroid. The measured movement was prescribed to the proximal AA end of an aortic finite element model to investigate its influences on aortic stresses. The finite element model was developed from a patient-specific geometry using LS-DYNA solver and validated against the aortic distensibility. Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) approach was also used to simulate blood hydrodynamic effects on aortic dilation and stresses. RESULTS: The AR in-plane motion was 5.5 ± 1.7 mm with the components of 3.1 ± 1.5 mm along the direction of proximal descending aorta (PDA) to AA centroid and 3.0 ± 1.3 mm perpendicularly under the PDA reference system. The AR axial motion elevated the longitudinal stress of proximal AA by 40% while the corresponding increase due to in-plane motion was always below 5%. The stresses at proximal AA resulted approximately 7% less in FSI simulation with blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: The AR in-plane motion was comparable with the magnitude of axial motion. Neither axial nor in-plane motion could directly lead to AA dissection. It is necessary to consider the heterogeneous pressures related to blood hydrodynamics when studying aortic wall stress levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12938-019-0632-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.