Cargando…

Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Prenatal Diagnostic Procedures Anxiety Scale questionnaire for application in the Brazilian cultural context. METHODS: The translation and back translation processes followed internationally accepted criteria. A committee of experts evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindermann, Lucas, Traebert, Jefferson, Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6391928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30726499
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000621
_version_ 1783398392409358336
author Kindermann, Lucas
Traebert, Jefferson
Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
author_facet Kindermann, Lucas
Traebert, Jefferson
Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
author_sort Kindermann, Lucas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Prenatal Diagnostic Procedures Anxiety Scale questionnaire for application in the Brazilian cultural context. METHODS: The translation and back translation processes followed internationally accepted criteria. A committee of experts evaluated the semantic, idiomatic, experimental and conceptual equivalence, proposing a pre-final version that was applied in 10.0% of the final sample. Afterwards, the final version was approved for the psychometric analysis. At that stage, 55 pregnant women participated which responded to the proposed Brazilian version before taking an ultrasound examination at a public hospital in Santa Catarina, in the year of 2017. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used as an external reliability parameter. The internal consistency of the instrument was obtained by Cronbach's alpha. Validation was performed by exploratory factorial analysis with extraction of principal components by the Kaiser-Guttman method and Varimax rotation. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha value of the total instrument was 0.886, and only the percentage of variance from item 2 (0.183) was not significant. The Kaiser-Guttman criterion defined three factors responsible for explaining 78.5% of the variance, as well as the Scree plot. Extraction of the main components by the Varimax method presented values from 0.713 to 0.926, with only item 2 being allocated in the third component. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version is reliable and valid for use in the diagnosis of anxiety related to the performance of ultrasound procedures in prenatal care. Due to the lack of correlation with the rest of the construct, it is suggested that item 2 be removed from the final version.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6391928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63919282019-03-01 Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures Kindermann, Lucas Traebert, Jefferson Nunes, Rodrigo Dias Rev Saude Publica Original Article OBJECTIVE: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Prenatal Diagnostic Procedures Anxiety Scale questionnaire for application in the Brazilian cultural context. METHODS: The translation and back translation processes followed internationally accepted criteria. A committee of experts evaluated the semantic, idiomatic, experimental and conceptual equivalence, proposing a pre-final version that was applied in 10.0% of the final sample. Afterwards, the final version was approved for the psychometric analysis. At that stage, 55 pregnant women participated which responded to the proposed Brazilian version before taking an ultrasound examination at a public hospital in Santa Catarina, in the year of 2017. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used as an external reliability parameter. The internal consistency of the instrument was obtained by Cronbach's alpha. Validation was performed by exploratory factorial analysis with extraction of principal components by the Kaiser-Guttman method and Varimax rotation. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha value of the total instrument was 0.886, and only the percentage of variance from item 2 (0.183) was not significant. The Kaiser-Guttman criterion defined three factors responsible for explaining 78.5% of the variance, as well as the Scree plot. Extraction of the main components by the Varimax method presented values from 0.713 to 0.926, with only item 2 being allocated in the third component. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version is reliable and valid for use in the diagnosis of anxiety related to the performance of ultrasound procedures in prenatal care. Due to the lack of correlation with the rest of the construct, it is suggested that item 2 be removed from the final version. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6391928/ /pubmed/30726499 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000621 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kindermann, Lucas
Traebert, Jefferson
Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title_full Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title_fullStr Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title_short Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
title_sort validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6391928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30726499
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000621
work_keys_str_mv AT kindermannlucas validationofananxietyscaleforprenataldiagnosticprocedures
AT traebertjefferson validationofananxietyscaleforprenataldiagnosticprocedures
AT nunesrodrigodias validationofananxietyscaleforprenataldiagnosticprocedures