Cargando…

Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models

This aims of this study were (I) to determine the velocity variable and regression model which best fit the load-velocity relationship during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise, (II) to compare the reliability of the velocity attained at each percentage of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Ramos, Amador, Ulloa-Díaz, David, Barboza-González, Paola, Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela, Martínez-García, Darío, Quidel-Catrilelbún, Mauricio, Guede-Rojas, Francisco, Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo, Janicijevic, Danica, Weakley, Jonathon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212085
_version_ 1783398439323697152
author García-Ramos, Amador
Ulloa-Díaz, David
Barboza-González, Paola
Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela
Martínez-García, Darío
Quidel-Catrilelbún, Mauricio
Guede-Rojas, Francisco
Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo
Janicijevic, Danica
Weakley, Jonathon
author_facet García-Ramos, Amador
Ulloa-Díaz, David
Barboza-González, Paola
Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela
Martínez-García, Darío
Quidel-Catrilelbún, Mauricio
Guede-Rojas, Francisco
Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo
Janicijevic, Danica
Weakley, Jonathon
author_sort García-Ramos, Amador
collection PubMed
description This aims of this study were (I) to determine the velocity variable and regression model which best fit the load-velocity relationship during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise, (II) to compare the reliability of the velocity attained at each percentage of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) between different velocity variables and regression models, and (III) to compare the within- and between-subject variability of the velocity attained at each %1RM. Eighteen men (14 rowers and four weightlifters) performed an incremental test during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise in two different sessions. General and individual load-velocity relationships were modelled through three velocity variables (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV] and peak velocity [PV]) and two regression models (linear and second-order polynomial). The main findings revealed that (I) the general (Pearson's correlation coefficient [r] range = 0.964–0.973) and individual (median r = 0.986 for MV, 0.989 for MPV, and 0.984 for PV) load-velocity relationships were highly linear, (II) the reliability of the velocity attained at each %1RM did not meaningfully differ between the velocity variables (coefficient of variation [CV] range = 2.55–7.61% for MV, 2.84–7.72% for MPV and 3.50–6.03% for PV) neither between the regression models (CV range = 2.55–7.72% and 2.73–5.25% for the linear and polynomial regressions, respectively), and (III) the within-subject variability of the velocity attained at each %1RM was lower than the between-subject variability for the light-moderate loads. No meaningful differences between the within- and between-subject CVs were observed for the MV of the 1RM trial (6.02% vs. 6.60%; CV(ratio) = 1.10), while the within-subject CV was lower for PV (6.36% vs. 7.56%; CV(ratio) = 1.19). These results suggest that the individual load-MV relationship should be determined with a linear regression model to obtain the most accurate prescription of the relative load during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63922502019-03-08 Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models García-Ramos, Amador Ulloa-Díaz, David Barboza-González, Paola Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela Martínez-García, Darío Quidel-Catrilelbún, Mauricio Guede-Rojas, Francisco Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo Janicijevic, Danica Weakley, Jonathon PLoS One Research Article This aims of this study were (I) to determine the velocity variable and regression model which best fit the load-velocity relationship during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise, (II) to compare the reliability of the velocity attained at each percentage of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) between different velocity variables and regression models, and (III) to compare the within- and between-subject variability of the velocity attained at each %1RM. Eighteen men (14 rowers and four weightlifters) performed an incremental test during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise in two different sessions. General and individual load-velocity relationships were modelled through three velocity variables (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV] and peak velocity [PV]) and two regression models (linear and second-order polynomial). The main findings revealed that (I) the general (Pearson's correlation coefficient [r] range = 0.964–0.973) and individual (median r = 0.986 for MV, 0.989 for MPV, and 0.984 for PV) load-velocity relationships were highly linear, (II) the reliability of the velocity attained at each %1RM did not meaningfully differ between the velocity variables (coefficient of variation [CV] range = 2.55–7.61% for MV, 2.84–7.72% for MPV and 3.50–6.03% for PV) neither between the regression models (CV range = 2.55–7.72% and 2.73–5.25% for the linear and polynomial regressions, respectively), and (III) the within-subject variability of the velocity attained at each %1RM was lower than the between-subject variability for the light-moderate loads. No meaningful differences between the within- and between-subject CVs were observed for the MV of the 1RM trial (6.02% vs. 6.60%; CV(ratio) = 1.10), while the within-subject CV was lower for PV (6.36% vs. 7.56%; CV(ratio) = 1.19). These results suggest that the individual load-MV relationship should be determined with a linear regression model to obtain the most accurate prescription of the relative load during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6392250/ /pubmed/30811432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212085 Text en © 2019 García-Ramos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
García-Ramos, Amador
Ulloa-Díaz, David
Barboza-González, Paola
Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela
Martínez-García, Darío
Quidel-Catrilelbún, Mauricio
Guede-Rojas, Francisco
Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo
Janicijevic, Danica
Weakley, Jonathon
Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title_full Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title_fullStr Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title_short Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
title_sort assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212085
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaramosamador assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT ulloadiazdavid assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT barbozagonzalezpaola assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT rodriguezpereaangela assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT martinezgarciadario assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT quidelcatrilelbunmauricio assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT guederojasfrancisco assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT cuevasaburtojesualdo assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT janicijevicdanica assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels
AT weakleyjonathon assessmentoftheloadvelocityprofileinthefreeweightpronebenchpullexercisethroughdifferentvelocityvariablesandregressionmodels