Cargando…

Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox

BACKGROUND: Iron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivieri, Nancy F., Sabouhanian, Amir, Gallie, Brenda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211942
_version_ 1783398440756051968
author Olivieri, Nancy F.
Sabouhanian, Amir
Gallie, Brenda L.
author_facet Olivieri, Nancy F.
Sabouhanian, Amir
Gallie, Brenda L.
author_sort Olivieri, Nancy F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 based upon the results of randomized controlled trials, is now first-line therapy worldwide. In contrast, early investigator-initiated trials of deferiprone were prematurely terminated after investigators raised safety concerns. The FDA declined market approval of deferiprone; years later, it licensed the drug as “last resort” therapy, to be prescribed only if first-line drugs had failed. We undertook to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicities of deferiprone and deferasirox in one transfusion clinic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Under an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively inspected the electronic medical records of consented iron-loaded patients managed between 2009 and 2015 at The University Health Network (UHN), Toronto. We compared changes in liver and heart iron, adverse effects and other outcomes, in patients treated with deferiprone or deferasirox. RESULTS: Although deferiprone was unlicensed in Canada, one-third (n = 41) of locally-transfused patients had been switched from first-line, licensed therapies (deferoxamine or deferasirox) to regimens of unlicensed deferiprone. The primary endpoint of monitoring in iron overload, hepatic iron concentration (HIC), increased (worsened) during deferiprone monotherapy (mean 10±2–18±2 mg/g; p < 0.0003), exceeding the threshold for life-threatening complications (15 mg iron/g liver) in 50% patients. During deferasirox monotherapy, mean HIC decreased (improved) (11±1–6±1 mg/g; p < 0.0001). Follow-up HICs were significantly different following deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies (p < 0.0000002). Addition of low-dose deferoxamine (<40 mg/kg/day) to deferiprone did not result in reductions of HIC to <15 mg/g (baseline 20±4 mg/g; follow-up, 18±4 mg/g; p < 0.2) or in reduction in the proportion of patients with HIC exceeding 15 mg/g (p < 0.2). During deferiprone exposure, new diabetes mellitus, a recognized consequence of inadequate iron control, was diagnosed in 17% patients, most of whom had sustained HICs exceeding 15 mg/g for years; one woman died after 13 months of a regimen of deferiprone and low-dose deferasirox. During deferiprone exposure, serum ALT increased over baseline in 65% patients. Mean serum ALT increased 6.6-fold (p < 0.001) often persisting for years. During deferasirox exposure, mean ALT was unchanged (p < 0.84). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in the proportions of patients estimated to have elevated cardiac iron. CONCLUSIONS: Deferiprone showed ineffectiveness and significant toxicity in most patients. Combination with low doses of first-line therapies did not improve the effectiveness of deferiprone. Exposure to deferiprone, over six years while the drug was unlicensed, in the face of ineffectiveness and serious toxicities, demands review of the standards of local medical practice. The limited scope of regulatory approval of deferiprone, worldwide, should restrict its exposure to the few patients genuinely unable to tolerate the two effective, first-line therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63922562019-03-17 Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox Olivieri, Nancy F. Sabouhanian, Amir Gallie, Brenda L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Iron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 based upon the results of randomized controlled trials, is now first-line therapy worldwide. In contrast, early investigator-initiated trials of deferiprone were prematurely terminated after investigators raised safety concerns. The FDA declined market approval of deferiprone; years later, it licensed the drug as “last resort” therapy, to be prescribed only if first-line drugs had failed. We undertook to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicities of deferiprone and deferasirox in one transfusion clinic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Under an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively inspected the electronic medical records of consented iron-loaded patients managed between 2009 and 2015 at The University Health Network (UHN), Toronto. We compared changes in liver and heart iron, adverse effects and other outcomes, in patients treated with deferiprone or deferasirox. RESULTS: Although deferiprone was unlicensed in Canada, one-third (n = 41) of locally-transfused patients had been switched from first-line, licensed therapies (deferoxamine or deferasirox) to regimens of unlicensed deferiprone. The primary endpoint of monitoring in iron overload, hepatic iron concentration (HIC), increased (worsened) during deferiprone monotherapy (mean 10±2–18±2 mg/g; p < 0.0003), exceeding the threshold for life-threatening complications (15 mg iron/g liver) in 50% patients. During deferasirox monotherapy, mean HIC decreased (improved) (11±1–6±1 mg/g; p < 0.0001). Follow-up HICs were significantly different following deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies (p < 0.0000002). Addition of low-dose deferoxamine (<40 mg/kg/day) to deferiprone did not result in reductions of HIC to <15 mg/g (baseline 20±4 mg/g; follow-up, 18±4 mg/g; p < 0.2) or in reduction in the proportion of patients with HIC exceeding 15 mg/g (p < 0.2). During deferiprone exposure, new diabetes mellitus, a recognized consequence of inadequate iron control, was diagnosed in 17% patients, most of whom had sustained HICs exceeding 15 mg/g for years; one woman died after 13 months of a regimen of deferiprone and low-dose deferasirox. During deferiprone exposure, serum ALT increased over baseline in 65% patients. Mean serum ALT increased 6.6-fold (p < 0.001) often persisting for years. During deferasirox exposure, mean ALT was unchanged (p < 0.84). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in the proportions of patients estimated to have elevated cardiac iron. CONCLUSIONS: Deferiprone showed ineffectiveness and significant toxicity in most patients. Combination with low doses of first-line therapies did not improve the effectiveness of deferiprone. Exposure to deferiprone, over six years while the drug was unlicensed, in the face of ineffectiveness and serious toxicities, demands review of the standards of local medical practice. The limited scope of regulatory approval of deferiprone, worldwide, should restrict its exposure to the few patients genuinely unable to tolerate the two effective, first-line therapies. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6392256/ /pubmed/30811439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211942 Text en © 2019 Olivieri et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olivieri, Nancy F.
Sabouhanian, Amir
Gallie, Brenda L.
Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title_full Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title_fullStr Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title_full_unstemmed Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title_short Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
title_sort single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211942
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierinancyf singlecenterretrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandtoxicityoftheoralironchelatingdrugsdeferiproneanddeferasirox
AT sabouhanianamir singlecenterretrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandtoxicityoftheoralironchelatingdrugsdeferiproneanddeferasirox
AT galliebrendal singlecenterretrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandtoxicityoftheoralironchelatingdrugsdeferiproneanddeferasirox