Cargando…
Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study
Discrepancies in patients’ responses to various outcome measures challenge clinicians’ evaluation of treatment outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to 1) evaluate the concordance of outcome measures after spine injection, 2) determine the patient variables that lead to discordant responses, and 3) suggest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211763 |
_version_ | 1783398445204111360 |
---|---|
author | Seo, Jiwoon Lee, Joon Woo Kang, Yusuhn Lee, Eugene Ahn, Joong Mo Kim, Dong Hyun Kang, Heung Sik |
author_facet | Seo, Jiwoon Lee, Joon Woo Kang, Yusuhn Lee, Eugene Ahn, Joong Mo Kim, Dong Hyun Kang, Heung Sik |
author_sort | Seo, Jiwoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Discrepancies in patients’ responses to various outcome measures challenge clinicians’ evaluation of treatment outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to 1) evaluate the concordance of outcome measures after spine injection, 2) determine the patient variables that lead to discordant responses, and 3) suggest practical outcome measure for spine injections with good responsiveness. From October 2014 to November 2014, 164 patients with neck or low back pain who visited our outpatient clinics and had spine injections on the previous visit were enrolled. We asked patients to report changes in their symptom in the form of outcome measures: numeric rating scale, Oswestry disability index, neck disability index, residual symptom percentage and global perceived effect. The responses were categorized into three groups according to the degree of change; not improved, minimally improved, and significantly improved. The concordances of these categorized answers were evaluated. When “significantly improved” was considered as true improvement, 46 (28%) of the 164 patients had discordant responses to the four measures. There was no significant patients’ variable that affects discordance in the outcome measures. Good agreement was shown between the global perceived effect and residual symptom percentage, while the Oswestry disability index had poor agreement with the other measurements. The calculated numeric rating scale and residual symptom percentage also had low levels of agreement. However, patients with severe pre-treatment pain tended to have better agreement. In conclusion, this result suggest that the residual symptom percentage may be a more practical for clinicians and better represent patients’ improvements after spine injection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6392275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63922752019-03-08 Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study Seo, Jiwoon Lee, Joon Woo Kang, Yusuhn Lee, Eugene Ahn, Joong Mo Kim, Dong Hyun Kang, Heung Sik PLoS One Research Article Discrepancies in patients’ responses to various outcome measures challenge clinicians’ evaluation of treatment outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to 1) evaluate the concordance of outcome measures after spine injection, 2) determine the patient variables that lead to discordant responses, and 3) suggest practical outcome measure for spine injections with good responsiveness. From October 2014 to November 2014, 164 patients with neck or low back pain who visited our outpatient clinics and had spine injections on the previous visit were enrolled. We asked patients to report changes in their symptom in the form of outcome measures: numeric rating scale, Oswestry disability index, neck disability index, residual symptom percentage and global perceived effect. The responses were categorized into three groups according to the degree of change; not improved, minimally improved, and significantly improved. The concordances of these categorized answers were evaluated. When “significantly improved” was considered as true improvement, 46 (28%) of the 164 patients had discordant responses to the four measures. There was no significant patients’ variable that affects discordance in the outcome measures. Good agreement was shown between the global perceived effect and residual symptom percentage, while the Oswestry disability index had poor agreement with the other measurements. The calculated numeric rating scale and residual symptom percentage also had low levels of agreement. However, patients with severe pre-treatment pain tended to have better agreement. In conclusion, this result suggest that the residual symptom percentage may be a more practical for clinicians and better represent patients’ improvements after spine injection. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6392275/ /pubmed/30811428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211763 Text en © 2019 Seo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seo, Jiwoon Lee, Joon Woo Kang, Yusuhn Lee, Eugene Ahn, Joong Mo Kim, Dong Hyun Kang, Heung Sik Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title | Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title_full | Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title_short | Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study |
title_sort | evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seojiwoon evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT leejoonwoo evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT kangyusuhn evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT leeeugene evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT ahnjoongmo evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT kimdonghyun evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy AT kangheungsik evaluationoftheresponsivenessofoutcomemeasuresafterspineinjectionaretrospectivestudy |