Cargando…

Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison

Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmeester, Tim R., Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M., Odden, John, Andrén, Henrik, Kindberg, Jonas, Linnell, John D. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878
_version_ 1783398463317213184
author Hofmeester, Tim R.
Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.
Odden, John
Andrén, Henrik
Kindberg, Jonas
Linnell, John D. C.
author_facet Hofmeester, Tim R.
Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.
Odden, John
Andrén, Henrik
Kindberg, Jonas
Linnell, John D. C.
author_sort Hofmeester, Tim R.
collection PubMed
description Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produced. It is in these circumstances that it becomes paramount to correct for the species‐ and study‐specific variation in imperfect detection within CTs. We reviewed the literature and used our own experience to compile a list of factors that affect CT detection of animals. We did this within a conceptual framework of six distinct scales separating out the influences of (a) animal characteristics, (b) CT specifications, (c) CT set‐up protocols, and (d) environmental variables. We identified 40 factors that can potentially influence the detection of animals by CTs at these six scales. Many of these factors were related to only a few overarching parameters. Most of the animal characteristics scale with body mass and diet type, and most environmental characteristics differ with season or latitude such that remote sensing products like NDVI could be used as a proxy index to capture this variation. Factors that influence detection at the microsite and camera scales are probably the most important in determining CT detection of animals. The type of study and specific research question will determine which factors should be corrected. Corrections can be done by directly adjusting the CT metric of interest or by using covariates in a statistical framework. Our conceptual framework can be used to design better CT studies and help when analyzing CT data. Furthermore, it provides an overview of which factors should be reported in CT studies to make them repeatable, comparable, and their data reusable. This should greatly improve the possibilities for global scale analyses of (reused) CT data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63923532019-03-07 Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison Hofmeester, Tim R. Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M. Odden, John Andrén, Henrik Kindberg, Jonas Linnell, John D. C. Ecol Evol Review Articles Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produced. It is in these circumstances that it becomes paramount to correct for the species‐ and study‐specific variation in imperfect detection within CTs. We reviewed the literature and used our own experience to compile a list of factors that affect CT detection of animals. We did this within a conceptual framework of six distinct scales separating out the influences of (a) animal characteristics, (b) CT specifications, (c) CT set‐up protocols, and (d) environmental variables. We identified 40 factors that can potentially influence the detection of animals by CTs at these six scales. Many of these factors were related to only a few overarching parameters. Most of the animal characteristics scale with body mass and diet type, and most environmental characteristics differ with season or latitude such that remote sensing products like NDVI could be used as a proxy index to capture this variation. Factors that influence detection at the microsite and camera scales are probably the most important in determining CT detection of animals. The type of study and specific research question will determine which factors should be corrected. Corrections can be done by directly adjusting the CT metric of interest or by using covariates in a statistical framework. Our conceptual framework can be used to design better CT studies and help when analyzing CT data. Furthermore, it provides an overview of which factors should be reported in CT studies to make them repeatable, comparable, and their data reusable. This should greatly improve the possibilities for global scale analyses of (reused) CT data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6392353/ /pubmed/30847112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Hofmeester, Tim R.
Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.
Odden, John
Andrén, Henrik
Kindberg, Jonas
Linnell, John D. C.
Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title_full Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title_fullStr Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title_full_unstemmed Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title_short Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
title_sort framing pictures: a conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmeestertimr framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison
AT cromsigtjorispgm framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison
AT oddenjohn framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison
AT andrenhenrik framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison
AT kindbergjonas framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison
AT linnelljohndc framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison