Cargando…
Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878 |
_version_ | 1783398463317213184 |
---|---|
author | Hofmeester, Tim R. Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M. Odden, John Andrén, Henrik Kindberg, Jonas Linnell, John D. C. |
author_facet | Hofmeester, Tim R. Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M. Odden, John Andrén, Henrik Kindberg, Jonas Linnell, John D. C. |
author_sort | Hofmeester, Tim R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produced. It is in these circumstances that it becomes paramount to correct for the species‐ and study‐specific variation in imperfect detection within CTs. We reviewed the literature and used our own experience to compile a list of factors that affect CT detection of animals. We did this within a conceptual framework of six distinct scales separating out the influences of (a) animal characteristics, (b) CT specifications, (c) CT set‐up protocols, and (d) environmental variables. We identified 40 factors that can potentially influence the detection of animals by CTs at these six scales. Many of these factors were related to only a few overarching parameters. Most of the animal characteristics scale with body mass and diet type, and most environmental characteristics differ with season or latitude such that remote sensing products like NDVI could be used as a proxy index to capture this variation. Factors that influence detection at the microsite and camera scales are probably the most important in determining CT detection of animals. The type of study and specific research question will determine which factors should be corrected. Corrections can be done by directly adjusting the CT metric of interest or by using covariates in a statistical framework. Our conceptual framework can be used to design better CT studies and help when analyzing CT data. Furthermore, it provides an overview of which factors should be reported in CT studies to make them repeatable, comparable, and their data reusable. This should greatly improve the possibilities for global scale analyses of (reused) CT data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6392353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63923532019-03-07 Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison Hofmeester, Tim R. Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M. Odden, John Andrén, Henrik Kindberg, Jonas Linnell, John D. C. Ecol Evol Review Articles Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produced. It is in these circumstances that it becomes paramount to correct for the species‐ and study‐specific variation in imperfect detection within CTs. We reviewed the literature and used our own experience to compile a list of factors that affect CT detection of animals. We did this within a conceptual framework of six distinct scales separating out the influences of (a) animal characteristics, (b) CT specifications, (c) CT set‐up protocols, and (d) environmental variables. We identified 40 factors that can potentially influence the detection of animals by CTs at these six scales. Many of these factors were related to only a few overarching parameters. Most of the animal characteristics scale with body mass and diet type, and most environmental characteristics differ with season or latitude such that remote sensing products like NDVI could be used as a proxy index to capture this variation. Factors that influence detection at the microsite and camera scales are probably the most important in determining CT detection of animals. The type of study and specific research question will determine which factors should be corrected. Corrections can be done by directly adjusting the CT metric of interest or by using covariates in a statistical framework. Our conceptual framework can be used to design better CT studies and help when analyzing CT data. Furthermore, it provides an overview of which factors should be reported in CT studies to make them repeatable, comparable, and their data reusable. This should greatly improve the possibilities for global scale analyses of (reused) CT data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6392353/ /pubmed/30847112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Hofmeester, Tim R. Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M. Odden, John Andrén, Henrik Kindberg, Jonas Linnell, John D. C. Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title | Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title_full | Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title_fullStr | Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title_short | Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
title_sort | framing pictures: a conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmeestertimr framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison AT cromsigtjorispgm framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison AT oddenjohn framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison AT andrenhenrik framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison AT kindbergjonas framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison AT linnelljohndc framingpicturesaconceptualframeworktoidentifyandcorrectforbiasesindetectionprobabilityofcameratrapsenablingmultispeciescomparison |