Cargando…

Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the technology used to collect data on the movement and activity patterns of humans and animals. GPS units, which form the primary source of location data, have become cheaper, more accurate, lighter and less power‐hungry, and their accuracy h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chisholm, Sarah, Stein, Andrew B., Jordan, Neil R., Hubel, Tatjana M., Shawe‐Taylor, John, Fearn, Tom, McNutt, J. Weldon, Wilson, Alan M., Hailes, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4805
_version_ 1783398468021125120
author Chisholm, Sarah
Stein, Andrew B.
Jordan, Neil R.
Hubel, Tatjana M.
Shawe‐Taylor, John
Fearn, Tom
McNutt, J. Weldon
Wilson, Alan M.
Hailes, Stephen
author_facet Chisholm, Sarah
Stein, Andrew B.
Jordan, Neil R.
Hubel, Tatjana M.
Shawe‐Taylor, John
Fearn, Tom
McNutt, J. Weldon
Wilson, Alan M.
Hailes, Stephen
author_sort Chisholm, Sarah
collection PubMed
description In recent years, there have been significant advances in the technology used to collect data on the movement and activity patterns of humans and animals. GPS units, which form the primary source of location data, have become cheaper, more accurate, lighter and less power‐hungry, and their accuracy has been further improved with the addition of inertial measurement units. The consequence is a glut of geospatial time series data, recorded at rates that range from one position fix every several hours (to maximize system lifetime) to ten fixes per second (in high dynamic situations). Since data of this quality and volume have only recently become available, the analytical methods to extract behavioral information from raw position data are at an early stage of development. An instance of this lies in the analysis of animal movement patterns. When investigating solitary animals, the timing and location of instances of avoidance and association are important behavioral markers. In this paper, a novel analytical method to detect avoidance and association between individuals is proposed; unlike existing methods, assumptions about the shape of the territories or the nature of individual movement are not needed. Simulations demonstrate that false positives (type I error) are rare (1%–3%), which means that the test rarely suggests that there is an association if there is none.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63923742019-03-07 Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction Chisholm, Sarah Stein, Andrew B. Jordan, Neil R. Hubel, Tatjana M. Shawe‐Taylor, John Fearn, Tom McNutt, J. Weldon Wilson, Alan M. Hailes, Stephen Ecol Evol Original Research In recent years, there have been significant advances in the technology used to collect data on the movement and activity patterns of humans and animals. GPS units, which form the primary source of location data, have become cheaper, more accurate, lighter and less power‐hungry, and their accuracy has been further improved with the addition of inertial measurement units. The consequence is a glut of geospatial time series data, recorded at rates that range from one position fix every several hours (to maximize system lifetime) to ten fixes per second (in high dynamic situations). Since data of this quality and volume have only recently become available, the analytical methods to extract behavioral information from raw position data are at an early stage of development. An instance of this lies in the analysis of animal movement patterns. When investigating solitary animals, the timing and location of instances of avoidance and association are important behavioral markers. In this paper, a novel analytical method to detect avoidance and association between individuals is proposed; unlike existing methods, assumptions about the shape of the territories or the nature of individual movement are not needed. Simulations demonstrate that false positives (type I error) are rare (1%–3%), which means that the test rarely suggests that there is an association if there is none. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6392374/ /pubmed/30847062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4805 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chisholm, Sarah
Stein, Andrew B.
Jordan, Neil R.
Hubel, Tatjana M.
Shawe‐Taylor, John
Fearn, Tom
McNutt, J. Weldon
Wilson, Alan M.
Hailes, Stephen
Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title_full Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title_fullStr Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title_full_unstemmed Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title_short Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
title_sort parsimonious test of dynamic interaction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4805
work_keys_str_mv AT chisholmsarah parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT steinandrewb parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT jordanneilr parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT hubeltatjanam parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT shawetaylorjohn parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT fearntom parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT mcnuttjweldon parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT wilsonalanm parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction
AT hailesstephen parsimonioustestofdynamicinteraction