Cargando…

DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia

The rapid conversion of Southeast Asian lowland rainforests into monocultures calls for the development of rapid methods for species identification to support ecological research and sustainable land‐use management. Here, we investigated the utilization of DNA barcodes for identifying flowering plan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amandita, Fitri Y., Rembold, Katja, Vornam, Barbara, Rahayu, Sri, Siregar, Iskandar Z., Kreft, Holger, Finkeldey, Reiner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4875
_version_ 1783398471768735744
author Amandita, Fitri Y.
Rembold, Katja
Vornam, Barbara
Rahayu, Sri
Siregar, Iskandar Z.
Kreft, Holger
Finkeldey, Reiner
author_facet Amandita, Fitri Y.
Rembold, Katja
Vornam, Barbara
Rahayu, Sri
Siregar, Iskandar Z.
Kreft, Holger
Finkeldey, Reiner
author_sort Amandita, Fitri Y.
collection PubMed
description The rapid conversion of Southeast Asian lowland rainforests into monocultures calls for the development of rapid methods for species identification to support ecological research and sustainable land‐use management. Here, we investigated the utilization of DNA barcodes for identifying flowering plants from Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 1,207 matK barcodes (441 species) and 2,376 rbcL barcodes (750 species) were successfully generated. The barcode effectiveness is assessed using four approaches: (a) comparison between morphological and molecular identification results, (b) best‐close match analysis with TaxonDNA, (c) barcoding gap analysis, and (d) formation of monophyletic groups. Results show that rbcL has a much higher level of sequence recoverability than matK (95% and 66%). The comparison between morphological and molecular identifications revealed that matK and rbcL worked best assigning a plant specimen to the genus level. Estimates of identification success using best‐close match analysis showed that >70% of the investigated species were correctly identified when using single barcode. The use of two‐loci barcodes was able to increase the identification success up to 80%. The barcoding gap analysis revealed that neither matK nor rbcL succeeded to create a clear gap between the intraspecific and interspecific divergences. However, these two barcodes were able to discriminate at least 70% of the species from each other. Fifteen genera and twenty‐one species were found to be nonmonophyletic with both markers. The two‐loci barcodes were sufficient to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among the plant taxa in the study area that are congruent with the broadly accepted APG III phylogeny.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63923902019-03-07 DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia Amandita, Fitri Y. Rembold, Katja Vornam, Barbara Rahayu, Sri Siregar, Iskandar Z. Kreft, Holger Finkeldey, Reiner Ecol Evol Original Research The rapid conversion of Southeast Asian lowland rainforests into monocultures calls for the development of rapid methods for species identification to support ecological research and sustainable land‐use management. Here, we investigated the utilization of DNA barcodes for identifying flowering plants from Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 1,207 matK barcodes (441 species) and 2,376 rbcL barcodes (750 species) were successfully generated. The barcode effectiveness is assessed using four approaches: (a) comparison between morphological and molecular identification results, (b) best‐close match analysis with TaxonDNA, (c) barcoding gap analysis, and (d) formation of monophyletic groups. Results show that rbcL has a much higher level of sequence recoverability than matK (95% and 66%). The comparison between morphological and molecular identifications revealed that matK and rbcL worked best assigning a plant specimen to the genus level. Estimates of identification success using best‐close match analysis showed that >70% of the investigated species were correctly identified when using single barcode. The use of two‐loci barcodes was able to increase the identification success up to 80%. The barcoding gap analysis revealed that neither matK nor rbcL succeeded to create a clear gap between the intraspecific and interspecific divergences. However, these two barcodes were able to discriminate at least 70% of the species from each other. Fifteen genera and twenty‐one species were found to be nonmonophyletic with both markers. The two‐loci barcodes were sufficient to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among the plant taxa in the study area that are congruent with the broadly accepted APG III phylogeny. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6392390/ /pubmed/30847077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4875 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Amandita, Fitri Y.
Rembold, Katja
Vornam, Barbara
Rahayu, Sri
Siregar, Iskandar Z.
Kreft, Holger
Finkeldey, Reiner
DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_fullStr DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_short DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_sort dna barcoding of flowering plants in sumatra, indonesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4875
work_keys_str_mv AT amanditafitriy dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT remboldkatja dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT vornambarbara dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT rahayusri dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT siregariskandarz dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT kreftholger dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia
AT finkeldeyreiner dnabarcodingoffloweringplantsinsumatraindonesia