Cargando…

Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment

Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of dementia, but early identification and active intervention can reduce its morbidity and the incidence of dementia. There is currently no suitable neuropsychological assessment scale to effectively identify MCI in neurological outpatie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xueyan, Dai, Jie, Zhao, Shasha, Liu, Wangen, Li, Haimei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010966
_version_ 1783398491004862464
author Li, Xueyan
Dai, Jie
Zhao, Shasha
Liu, Wangen
Li, Haimei
author_facet Li, Xueyan
Dai, Jie
Zhao, Shasha
Liu, Wangen
Li, Haimei
author_sort Li, Xueyan
collection PubMed
description Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of dementia, but early identification and active intervention can reduce its morbidity and the incidence of dementia. There is currently no suitable neuropsychological assessment scale to effectively identify MCI in neurological outpatient departments in China. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is often used to screen for MCI in outpatient departments in China. To compare the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE in screening patients for MCI in a neurological outpatient department, and determine differences in the value of Mini-Cog for different ages and educational levels. This was a retrospective study of 229 patients with suspected MCI who visited the Cangzhou Central Hospital between March 2012 and April 2016. The MCI group included 119 patients diagnosed with MCI and 110 cases without MCI (non-MCI group). The MCI patients were subgrouped as 40 to 60 years of age, 61 to 80 years, and >80 years; and as without education, ≤6 years education, and >6 years education. All subjects were assessed using the Mini-Cog and MMSE. There were significant differences in Mini-Cog (P < .05) and MMSE (P < .05) between the MCI and non-MCI groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden index (85.71%, 79.41%, 0.8108, 0.8438, and 0.6550) of Mini-Cog were all higher than those of MMSE (64.76%, 71.57%, 0.7010, 0.6364, and 0.3370) in identifying MCI, but there was no significant difference in specificity (P > .05). Mini-Cog was better than MMSE (P < .05) for MCI patients with different ages and education levels. These results showed that the Mini-Cog was superior to MMSE in identifying MCI patients. Mini-Cog was less affected by age and education level than MMSE. The Mini-Cog assessment was short (3–4 minutes) and easily accepted by the patients. Mini-Cog could be more suitable for application in outpatient department in primary hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63925202019-03-15 Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment Li, Xueyan Dai, Jie Zhao, Shasha Liu, Wangen Li, Haimei Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of dementia, but early identification and active intervention can reduce its morbidity and the incidence of dementia. There is currently no suitable neuropsychological assessment scale to effectively identify MCI in neurological outpatient departments in China. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is often used to screen for MCI in outpatient departments in China. To compare the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE in screening patients for MCI in a neurological outpatient department, and determine differences in the value of Mini-Cog for different ages and educational levels. This was a retrospective study of 229 patients with suspected MCI who visited the Cangzhou Central Hospital between March 2012 and April 2016. The MCI group included 119 patients diagnosed with MCI and 110 cases without MCI (non-MCI group). The MCI patients were subgrouped as 40 to 60 years of age, 61 to 80 years, and >80 years; and as without education, ≤6 years education, and >6 years education. All subjects were assessed using the Mini-Cog and MMSE. There were significant differences in Mini-Cog (P < .05) and MMSE (P < .05) between the MCI and non-MCI groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden index (85.71%, 79.41%, 0.8108, 0.8438, and 0.6550) of Mini-Cog were all higher than those of MMSE (64.76%, 71.57%, 0.7010, 0.6364, and 0.3370) in identifying MCI, but there was no significant difference in specificity (P > .05). Mini-Cog was better than MMSE (P < .05) for MCI patients with different ages and education levels. These results showed that the Mini-Cog was superior to MMSE in identifying MCI patients. Mini-Cog was less affected by age and education level than MMSE. The Mini-Cog assessment was short (3–4 minutes) and easily accepted by the patients. Mini-Cog could be more suitable for application in outpatient department in primary hospitals. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6392520/ /pubmed/29851846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010966 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xueyan
Dai, Jie
Zhao, Shasha
Liu, Wangen
Li, Haimei
Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title_full Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title_fullStr Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title_short Comparison of the value of Mini-Cog and MMSE screening in the rapid identification of Chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
title_sort comparison of the value of mini-cog and mmse screening in the rapid identification of chinese outpatients with mild cognitive impairment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010966
work_keys_str_mv AT lixueyan comparisonofthevalueofminicogandmmsescreeningintherapididentificationofchineseoutpatientswithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT daijie comparisonofthevalueofminicogandmmsescreeningintherapididentificationofchineseoutpatientswithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT zhaoshasha comparisonofthevalueofminicogandmmsescreeningintherapididentificationofchineseoutpatientswithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT liuwangen comparisonofthevalueofminicogandmmsescreeningintherapididentificationofchineseoutpatientswithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT lihaimei comparisonofthevalueofminicogandmmsescreeningintherapididentificationofchineseoutpatientswithmildcognitiveimpairment