Cargando…
Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255 |
_version_ | 1783398583725195264 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Ming Liu, Guilin Luo, Guoliang Wu, Tianyu |
author_facet | Fang, Ming Liu, Guilin Luo, Guoliang Wu, Tianyu |
author_sort | Fang, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing the effect of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. We presented success rates of pigtail catheter drainage as primary outcomes, and considered the duration of drainage, and complication rates as secondary outcomes. Pooled data were available using the fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: The meta-analysis was based on 16 articles with a total of 1067 patients. Our analyses showed that pooled success rates were 0.77 (0.71–0.82), )furthermore, duration of drainage was 5.61 (3.99–7.23), and complication rates 0.18 (0.09–0.27). Subgroup results according to causes of pneumothorax and patient characteristics were robust and all consistent with overall outcomes. CONCLUSION: These suggested that pigtail catheter insertion within radiological guidance may provide a safe and effective way for the treatment of pneumothorax. More large-scale and prospective studies were required to determine these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6392921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63929212019-03-15 Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Fang, Ming Liu, Guilin Luo, Guoliang Wu, Tianyu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing the effect of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. We presented success rates of pigtail catheter drainage as primary outcomes, and considered the duration of drainage, and complication rates as secondary outcomes. Pooled data were available using the fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: The meta-analysis was based on 16 articles with a total of 1067 patients. Our analyses showed that pooled success rates were 0.77 (0.71–0.82), )furthermore, duration of drainage was 5.61 (3.99–7.23), and complication rates 0.18 (0.09–0.27). Subgroup results according to causes of pneumothorax and patient characteristics were robust and all consistent with overall outcomes. CONCLUSION: These suggested that pigtail catheter insertion within radiological guidance may provide a safe and effective way for the treatment of pneumothorax. More large-scale and prospective studies were required to determine these findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6392921/ /pubmed/30461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fang, Ming Liu, Guilin Luo, Guoliang Wu, Tianyu Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangming doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuguilin doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luoguoliang doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wutianyu doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |