Cargando…

Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Ming, Liu, Guilin, Luo, Guoliang, Wu, Tianyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255
_version_ 1783398583725195264
author Fang, Ming
Liu, Guilin
Luo, Guoliang
Wu, Tianyu
author_facet Fang, Ming
Liu, Guilin
Luo, Guoliang
Wu, Tianyu
author_sort Fang, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing the effect of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. We presented success rates of pigtail catheter drainage as primary outcomes, and considered the duration of drainage, and complication rates as secondary outcomes. Pooled data were available using the fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: The meta-analysis was based on 16 articles with a total of 1067 patients. Our analyses showed that pooled success rates were 0.77 (0.71–0.82), )furthermore, duration of drainage was 5.61 (3.99–7.23), and complication rates 0.18 (0.09–0.27). Subgroup results according to causes of pneumothorax and patient characteristics were robust and all consistent with overall outcomes. CONCLUSION: These suggested that pigtail catheter insertion within radiological guidance may provide a safe and effective way for the treatment of pneumothorax. More large-scale and prospective studies were required to determine these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63929212019-03-15 Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Fang, Ming Liu, Guilin Luo, Guoliang Wu, Tianyu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Pigtail catheter drainage has been usually applied for the treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of retro- or pro-spective studies addressing the effect of pigtail catheters for pneumothorax. We presented success rates of pigtail catheter drainage as primary outcomes, and considered the duration of drainage, and complication rates as secondary outcomes. Pooled data were available using the fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: The meta-analysis was based on 16 articles with a total of 1067 patients. Our analyses showed that pooled success rates were 0.77 (0.71–0.82), )furthermore, duration of drainage was 5.61 (3.99–7.23), and complication rates 0.18 (0.09–0.27). Subgroup results according to causes of pneumothorax and patient characteristics were robust and all consistent with overall outcomes. CONCLUSION: These suggested that pigtail catheter insertion within radiological guidance may provide a safe and effective way for the treatment of pneumothorax. More large-scale and prospective studies were required to determine these findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6392921/ /pubmed/30461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fang, Ming
Liu, Guilin
Luo, Guoliang
Wu, Tianyu
Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does pigtail catheters relieve pneumothorax?: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013255
work_keys_str_mv AT fangming doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuguilin doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luoguoliang doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wutianyu doespigtailcathetersrelievepneumothoraxaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis