Cargando…
Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the...
Autores principales: | Ryan, Matt, Briceno, Natalia, Perera, Divaka |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Cardiology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808071 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2018.0443 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mechanical circulatory support in acute cardiogenic shock
por: Khan, Mubashar H, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Early Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Upadhrasta, Sireesha, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Acute Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Kuchibhotla, Sudeep, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art
por: Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: the “door to support” time
por: Esposito, Michele L, et al.
Publicado: (2017)