Cargando…

Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat

We elicited tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states to replicate the finding that TOTs repeat for individual words. Humphreys and colleagues have attributed this error repetition phenomenon to implicit learning of the mappings between the lemma and phonology. We also examined whether or not interlopers – rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, L. Kathleen, Humphreys, Karin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00341
_version_ 1783398664675262464
author Oliver, L. Kathleen
Humphreys, Karin R.
author_facet Oliver, L. Kathleen
Humphreys, Karin R.
author_sort Oliver, L. Kathleen
collection PubMed
description We elicited tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states to replicate the finding that TOTs repeat for individual words. Humphreys and colleagues have attributed this error repetition phenomenon to implicit learning of the mappings between the lemma and phonology. We also examined whether or not interlopers – repeated information that persistently comes to mind – repeat during TOT states for individual words, along with the type of interlopers. Participants were given a TOT test and the same TOT test one week later. The test consisted of the presentation of a definition and participants indicated if they knew the word, did not know the word, or if they were in a TOT state. Participants were also given 15 s to think aloud about the target word on both test and retest. We found that information repeats significantly more often for repeated TOT states (26%) than repeated Don’t Know states (13%). We also found that participants experienced significantly more repeated phonological interlopers during a repeated TOT state (59%) versus a repeated Don’t Know state (12%). Theoretically, the results may suggest that the TOT state is best described as a subthreshold state, and that within this subthreshold state there is a specific erroneous pattern of activation (akin to a local minimum) rather than a non-specific pattern of activation. These findings are an important constraint toward the development of a more formal explanation of recurring TOTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6393332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63933322019-03-07 Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat Oliver, L. Kathleen Humphreys, Karin R. Front Psychol Psychology We elicited tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states to replicate the finding that TOTs repeat for individual words. Humphreys and colleagues have attributed this error repetition phenomenon to implicit learning of the mappings between the lemma and phonology. We also examined whether or not interlopers – repeated information that persistently comes to mind – repeat during TOT states for individual words, along with the type of interlopers. Participants were given a TOT test and the same TOT test one week later. The test consisted of the presentation of a definition and participants indicated if they knew the word, did not know the word, or if they were in a TOT state. Participants were also given 15 s to think aloud about the target word on both test and retest. We found that information repeats significantly more often for repeated TOT states (26%) than repeated Don’t Know states (13%). We also found that participants experienced significantly more repeated phonological interlopers during a repeated TOT state (59%) versus a repeated Don’t Know state (12%). Theoretically, the results may suggest that the TOT state is best described as a subthreshold state, and that within this subthreshold state there is a specific erroneous pattern of activation (akin to a local minimum) rather than a non-specific pattern of activation. These findings are an important constraint toward the development of a more formal explanation of recurring TOTs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6393332/ /pubmed/30846955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00341 Text en Copyright © 2019 Oliver and Humphreys. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Oliver, L. Kathleen
Humphreys, Karin R.
Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title_full Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title_fullStr Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title_full_unstemmed Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title_short Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat
title_sort phonological interlopers tend to repeat when tip-of-the-tongue states repeat
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00341
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverlkathleen phonologicalinterloperstendtorepeatwhentipofthetonguestatesrepeat
AT humphreyskarinr phonologicalinterloperstendtorepeatwhentipofthetonguestatesrepeat