Cargando…
Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer
Autores principales: | Pyeon, Seung Yeon, Hur, Yun Jung, Lee, Jong-Min |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e43 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
por: Yang, Eun Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?
por: Ahn, Jung Hwan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)