Cargando…

Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication

Individuals can feel more motivated to change health behaviour when perceiving autonomy-support, as induced through non-pressuring message phrasing and the provision of choice: autonomy-supportive message framing. Additionally, controlling message phrasing – commands that do not provide choice – can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altendorf, Maria B., van Weert, Julia C.M., Hoving, Ciska, Smit, Eline S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619832767
_version_ 1783398764157861888
author Altendorf, Maria B.
van Weert, Julia C.M.
Hoving, Ciska
Smit, Eline S.
author_facet Altendorf, Maria B.
van Weert, Julia C.M.
Hoving, Ciska
Smit, Eline S.
author_sort Altendorf, Maria B.
collection PubMed
description Individuals can feel more motivated to change health behaviour when perceiving autonomy-support, as induced through non-pressuring message phrasing and the provision of choice: autonomy-supportive message framing. Additionally, controlling message phrasing – commands that do not provide choice – can thwart autonomy and lead to reactance, which is detrimental to the persuasiveness of health messages. Many health messages have not been formulated in an autonomy-supportive manner and therefore could arouse reactance, resulting in reduced intervention effectiveness. We aimed to test the effects of autonomy-supportive vs. controlling alcohol reduction message frames on individuals’ perceived autonomy-support from these messages; and their reactance towards the message while considering the individual need for autonomy in the context of an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. A 2 (autonomy-supportive language vs. controlling language) × 2 (choice vs. no choice) between-subjects experiment (N = 521) was conducted using an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. Outcome measures were perceived autonomy-support and reactance and we investigated whether an individual’s need for autonomy moderated the effect of autonomy-supportive and controlling message frames on those outcome variables. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that neither autonomy-supportive nor controlling message frames had significant effects on perceived autonomy-support or reactance, and there was no moderation from the need for autonomy. Overall, participants evaluated the intervention as positive and perceived high levels of autonomy-support, regardless of the message frame used. Future research needs to test whether the positive intervention evaluation is due to content tailoring, and whether more distinguishable manipulations of message frames could be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6393822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63938222019-03-04 Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication Altendorf, Maria B. van Weert, Julia C.M. Hoving, Ciska Smit, Eline S. Digit Health Tailored Health Communication Individuals can feel more motivated to change health behaviour when perceiving autonomy-support, as induced through non-pressuring message phrasing and the provision of choice: autonomy-supportive message framing. Additionally, controlling message phrasing – commands that do not provide choice – can thwart autonomy and lead to reactance, which is detrimental to the persuasiveness of health messages. Many health messages have not been formulated in an autonomy-supportive manner and therefore could arouse reactance, resulting in reduced intervention effectiveness. We aimed to test the effects of autonomy-supportive vs. controlling alcohol reduction message frames on individuals’ perceived autonomy-support from these messages; and their reactance towards the message while considering the individual need for autonomy in the context of an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. A 2 (autonomy-supportive language vs. controlling language) × 2 (choice vs. no choice) between-subjects experiment (N = 521) was conducted using an online computer-tailored alcohol reduction intervention. Outcome measures were perceived autonomy-support and reactance and we investigated whether an individual’s need for autonomy moderated the effect of autonomy-supportive and controlling message frames on those outcome variables. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that neither autonomy-supportive nor controlling message frames had significant effects on perceived autonomy-support or reactance, and there was no moderation from the need for autonomy. Overall, participants evaluated the intervention as positive and perceived high levels of autonomy-support, regardless of the message frame used. Future research needs to test whether the positive intervention evaluation is due to content tailoring, and whether more distinguishable manipulations of message frames could be effective. SAGE Publications 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6393822/ /pubmed/30834136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619832767 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Tailored Health Communication
Altendorf, Maria B.
van Weert, Julia C.M.
Hoving, Ciska
Smit, Eline S.
Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title_full Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title_fullStr Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title_full_unstemmed Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title_short Should or could? Testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
title_sort should or could? testing the use of autonomy-supportive language and the provision of choice in online computer-tailored alcohol reduction communication
topic Tailored Health Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619832767
work_keys_str_mv AT altendorfmariab shouldorcouldtestingtheuseofautonomysupportivelanguageandtheprovisionofchoiceinonlinecomputertailoredalcoholreductioncommunication
AT vanweertjuliacm shouldorcouldtestingtheuseofautonomysupportivelanguageandtheprovisionofchoiceinonlinecomputertailoredalcoholreductioncommunication
AT hovingciska shouldorcouldtestingtheuseofautonomysupportivelanguageandtheprovisionofchoiceinonlinecomputertailoredalcoholreductioncommunication
AT smitelines shouldorcouldtestingtheuseofautonomysupportivelanguageandtheprovisionofchoiceinonlinecomputertailoredalcoholreductioncommunication