Cargando…

Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND: An ophthalmology consultation service is of significant benefit to patients in the hospital and is an instructive component of a residency education program. Ophthalmology consultations in a hospital present unique challenges to those seen in an outpatient clinic, for which the consultin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Daniel J., Kanu, Levi N., Chen, Judy L., Aref, Ahmad A., Mieler, William F., MacIntosh, Peter W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7807391
_version_ 1783398782691442688
author Oh, Daniel J.
Kanu, Levi N.
Chen, Judy L.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Mieler, William F.
MacIntosh, Peter W.
author_facet Oh, Daniel J.
Kanu, Levi N.
Chen, Judy L.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Mieler, William F.
MacIntosh, Peter W.
author_sort Oh, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An ophthalmology consultation service is of significant benefit to patients in the hospital and is an instructive component of a residency education program. Ophthalmology consultations in a hospital present unique challenges to those seen in an outpatient clinic, for which the consulting ophthalmologist should be prepared. The purpose of this study was to profile the emergency room and inpatient ophthalmology consultations seen at an academic institution. METHODS: A prospective study of 581 patients was conducted on inpatient and emergency room ophthalmology consultations at the University of Illinois at Chicago over twelve months. Characteristics such as the consulting service, type of and reason for consultation, subspecialty staffing service, diagnosis, and suitability for in-hospital evaluation were recorded. RESULTS: Consultations were received from either inpatient wards (59.4%) or the Emergency Department (40.6%). The most common inpatient consulting services were internal medicine (22%), followed by neurosurgery (16%) and neurology (7%). All the consultations were categorized as acute (72.3%), chronic (6.0%), or screening (21.7%). Consultations categorized as screening included papilledema (31.0%), fungemia (20.6%), syndromic evaluation (19.8%), visual field evaluation (17.5%), and miscellaneous evaluation (11.1%). We classified the ophthalmic diagnoses into 63 unique diagnoses. Amongst the ophthalmic subspecialties, neuro-ophthalmologic diagnoses were the most common (32.0%), followed by retina (20.1%) and cornea (19.4%). Neuro-ophthalmology had the highest proportion of screening consultations (36.6%), while glaucoma had the least overall number of consultations (10.1%), and the least proportion of screening consultations (3.6%). A significant proportion of nonacute consultations (19.0%) was deemed to be more suitable for outpatient evaluation. DISCUSSION: Consultation databases can be useful in preparing trainees for in-hospital clinical care. A wide range of ocular pathologies may present to the ophthalmology consultant, from acute trauma to screening for systemic syndromes. Some consultations may be more suitable for outpatient evaluation which may help optimize patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6393906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63939062019-03-20 Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center Oh, Daniel J. Kanu, Levi N. Chen, Judy L. Aref, Ahmad A. Mieler, William F. MacIntosh, Peter W. J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: An ophthalmology consultation service is of significant benefit to patients in the hospital and is an instructive component of a residency education program. Ophthalmology consultations in a hospital present unique challenges to those seen in an outpatient clinic, for which the consulting ophthalmologist should be prepared. The purpose of this study was to profile the emergency room and inpatient ophthalmology consultations seen at an academic institution. METHODS: A prospective study of 581 patients was conducted on inpatient and emergency room ophthalmology consultations at the University of Illinois at Chicago over twelve months. Characteristics such as the consulting service, type of and reason for consultation, subspecialty staffing service, diagnosis, and suitability for in-hospital evaluation were recorded. RESULTS: Consultations were received from either inpatient wards (59.4%) or the Emergency Department (40.6%). The most common inpatient consulting services were internal medicine (22%), followed by neurosurgery (16%) and neurology (7%). All the consultations were categorized as acute (72.3%), chronic (6.0%), or screening (21.7%). Consultations categorized as screening included papilledema (31.0%), fungemia (20.6%), syndromic evaluation (19.8%), visual field evaluation (17.5%), and miscellaneous evaluation (11.1%). We classified the ophthalmic diagnoses into 63 unique diagnoses. Amongst the ophthalmic subspecialties, neuro-ophthalmologic diagnoses were the most common (32.0%), followed by retina (20.1%) and cornea (19.4%). Neuro-ophthalmology had the highest proportion of screening consultations (36.6%), while glaucoma had the least overall number of consultations (10.1%), and the least proportion of screening consultations (3.6%). A significant proportion of nonacute consultations (19.0%) was deemed to be more suitable for outpatient evaluation. DISCUSSION: Consultation databases can be useful in preparing trainees for in-hospital clinical care. A wide range of ocular pathologies may present to the ophthalmology consultant, from acute trauma to screening for systemic syndromes. Some consultations may be more suitable for outpatient evaluation which may help optimize patient care. Hindawi 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6393906/ /pubmed/30895161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7807391 Text en Copyright © 2019 Daniel J. Oh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oh, Daniel J.
Kanu, Levi N.
Chen, Judy L.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Mieler, William F.
MacIntosh, Peter W.
Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title_full Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title_fullStr Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title_full_unstemmed Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title_short Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center
title_sort inpatient and emergency room ophthalmology consultations at a tertiary care center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7807391
work_keys_str_mv AT ohdanielj inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter
AT kanulevin inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter
AT chenjudyl inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter
AT arefahmada inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter
AT mielerwilliamf inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter
AT macintoshpeterw inpatientandemergencyroomophthalmologyconsultationsatatertiarycarecenter