Cargando…

Impact of 3 Tesla MRI on interobserver agreement in clinically isolated syndrome: A MAGNIMS multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Compared to 1.5 T, 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases signal-to-noise ratio leading to improved image quality. However, its clinical relevance in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagens, Marloes HJ, Burggraaff, Jessica, Kilsdonk, Iris D, Ruggieri, Serena, Collorone, Sara, Cortese, Rosa, Cawley, Niamh, Sbardella, Emilia, Andelova, Michaela, Amann, Michael, Lieb, Johanna M, Pantano, Patrizia, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I, Killestein, Joep, Oreja-Guevara, Celia, Wuerfel, Jens, Ciccarelli, Olga, Gasperini, Claudio, Lukas, Carsten, Rovira, Alex, Barkhof, Frederik, Wattjes, Mike P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29327668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517751647
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Compared to 1.5 T, 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases signal-to-noise ratio leading to improved image quality. However, its clinical relevance in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate how 3 T MRI affects the agreement between raters on lesion detection and diagnosis. METHODS: We selected 30 patients and 10 healthy controls from our ongoing prospective multicentre cohort. All subjects received baseline 1.5 and 3 T brain and spinal cord MRI. Patients also received follow-up brain MRI at 3–6 months. Four experienced neuroradiologists and four less-experienced raters scored the number of lesions per anatomical region and determined dissemination in space and time (McDonald 2010). RESULTS: In controls, the mean number of lesions per rater was 0.16 at 1.5 T and 0.38 at 3 T (p = 0.005). For patients, this was 4.18 and 4.40, respectively (p = 0.657). Inter-rater agreement on involvement per anatomical region and dissemination in space and time was moderate to good for both field strengths. 3 T slightly improved agreement between experienced raters, but slightly decreased agreement between less-experienced raters. CONCLUSION: Overall, the interobserver agreement was moderate to good. 3 T appears to improve the reading for experienced readers, underlining the benefit of additional training.