Cargando…

Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs), i.e., C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and procollagen type I aminoterminal propeptide (PINP), are associated with fracture. METHODS: We searched electronic database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, and the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Aixian, Ma, Jianxiong, Feng, Kaiqiang, Liu, Zhaojie, Chen, Lei, Jia, Haobo, Ma, Xinlong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6
_version_ 1783398802064932864
author Tian, Aixian
Ma, Jianxiong
Feng, Kaiqiang
Liu, Zhaojie
Chen, Lei
Jia, Haobo
Ma, Xinlong
author_facet Tian, Aixian
Ma, Jianxiong
Feng, Kaiqiang
Liu, Zhaojie
Chen, Lei
Jia, Haobo
Ma, Xinlong
author_sort Tian, Aixian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore whether bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs), i.e., C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and procollagen type I aminoterminal propeptide (PINP), are associated with fracture. METHODS: We searched electronic database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, and the reference lists of relevant articles published from inception to August 22, 2018. An updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the prediction value of CTX and PINP in fracture. RESULTS: Nine articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The crude and adjusted effect size between PINP and fracture were extracted from two and five studies, respectively. PINP was not associated with fracture incidence without adjusting covariates (crude GR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91–1.17). After adjusting for potential confounders, PINP demonstrated a significant positive association with fracture (adjusted GR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15–1.42). In the subgroup analysis of studies after adjusting covariates, there were significant associations in women. Both the crude (1.16, 95%CI, 1.04–1.20) and adjusted GR (1.20, 95%CI, 1.05–1.37) shown positive relationships between CTX and fracture, which were extracted from four and six studies, separately. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. In the subgroup analysis of studies after adjusting covariates, there were significant associations in the subgroups of elderly, female, and hip fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a statistically significant but modest association between BTMs (s-PINP or s-CTX) and future fracture risk after adjusting for BMD and clinical risk factors. The causal relationship between the two clinical conditions requires future validation with more standardized studies. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018107879 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6393999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63939992019-03-11 Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis Tian, Aixian Ma, Jianxiong Feng, Kaiqiang Liu, Zhaojie Chen, Lei Jia, Haobo Ma, Xinlong J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To explore whether bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs), i.e., C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and procollagen type I aminoterminal propeptide (PINP), are associated with fracture. METHODS: We searched electronic database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, and the reference lists of relevant articles published from inception to August 22, 2018. An updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the prediction value of CTX and PINP in fracture. RESULTS: Nine articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The crude and adjusted effect size between PINP and fracture were extracted from two and five studies, respectively. PINP was not associated with fracture incidence without adjusting covariates (crude GR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91–1.17). After adjusting for potential confounders, PINP demonstrated a significant positive association with fracture (adjusted GR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15–1.42). In the subgroup analysis of studies after adjusting covariates, there were significant associations in women. Both the crude (1.16, 95%CI, 1.04–1.20) and adjusted GR (1.20, 95%CI, 1.05–1.37) shown positive relationships between CTX and fracture, which were extracted from four and six studies, separately. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. In the subgroup analysis of studies after adjusting covariates, there were significant associations in the subgroups of elderly, female, and hip fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a statistically significant but modest association between BTMs (s-PINP or s-CTX) and future fracture risk after adjusting for BMD and clinical risk factors. The causal relationship between the two clinical conditions requires future validation with more standardized studies. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018107879 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6393999/ /pubmed/30819222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tian, Aixian
Ma, Jianxiong
Feng, Kaiqiang
Liu, Zhaojie
Chen, Lei
Jia, Haobo
Ma, Xinlong
Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title_full Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title_short Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
title_sort reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tianaixian referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT majianxiong referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT fengkaiqiang referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT liuzhaojie referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT chenlei referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT jiahaobo referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis
AT maxinlong referencemarkersofboneturnoverforpredictionoffractureametaanalysis