Cargando…

Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a form of violence against women and girls that is widely performed in about 30 countries in Africa, Middle East and Asia. In Sudan, the prevalence of FGM/C among women aged 15–49 years was 87% in 2014. Little is known about household decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabahelzain, Majdi M., Gamal Eldin, Ahmed, Babiker, Suad, Kabiru, Caroline W., Eltayeb, Muna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0096-0
_version_ 1783398802292473856
author Sabahelzain, Majdi M.
Gamal Eldin, Ahmed
Babiker, Suad
Kabiru, Caroline W.
Eltayeb, Muna
author_facet Sabahelzain, Majdi M.
Gamal Eldin, Ahmed
Babiker, Suad
Kabiru, Caroline W.
Eltayeb, Muna
author_sort Sabahelzain, Majdi M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a form of violence against women and girls that is widely performed in about 30 countries in Africa, Middle East and Asia. In Sudan, the prevalence of FGM/C among women aged 15–49 years was 87% in 2014. Little is known about household decision-making as it relates to FGM/C. This study aimed to understand the key people involved in FGM/C-related decisions, and to assess predictors of households’ decision to cut or not cut the youngest daughter and the reasons for these decisions. METHODS: We drew on household survey data collected as part of a larger cross-sectional, mixed methods study in Sudan. The analytical sample comprised of data from 403 households that both reported that they had discussion around whether to cut the youngest daughter aged 19 years or younger and arrived at a decision to either cut or leave her uncut. Descriptive statistics summarizing the people involved in FGM/C-related decisions and the reasons for decisions are presented. We also present logistic regression analyses results summarizing predictors of households’ decision to leave the youngest daughter uncut. RESULTS: Household decision-making on FGM/C involved discussions among the nuclear and extended family, and non-family members. Mothers and fathers were found to be the key decision makers. A greater proportion of fathers were involved in instances where the final decision was to leave the daughter uncut. Thirty-six percent of households decided to leave the youngest daughter uncut. State of residence, mothers’ level of education and FGM/C status and exposure to FGM/C-related information or campaigns were associated with households’ decision to leave the daughter uncut. Health concerns were the most commonly cited reason for deciding not to cut their daughters (57%), while custom or culture was the most commonly cited reason for households deciding to cut their daughter (52%). CONCLUSION: FGM/C-related decisions result from deliberations that involve many people. Our findings underscore the important role that fathers play in decision-making and highlight the need to involve men in FGM/C programs. Findings also stress the need to understand and address the drivers of FGM/C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63940002019-03-11 Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study Sabahelzain, Majdi M. Gamal Eldin, Ahmed Babiker, Suad Kabiru, Caroline W. Eltayeb, Muna Glob Health Res Policy Research BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a form of violence against women and girls that is widely performed in about 30 countries in Africa, Middle East and Asia. In Sudan, the prevalence of FGM/C among women aged 15–49 years was 87% in 2014. Little is known about household decision-making as it relates to FGM/C. This study aimed to understand the key people involved in FGM/C-related decisions, and to assess predictors of households’ decision to cut or not cut the youngest daughter and the reasons for these decisions. METHODS: We drew on household survey data collected as part of a larger cross-sectional, mixed methods study in Sudan. The analytical sample comprised of data from 403 households that both reported that they had discussion around whether to cut the youngest daughter aged 19 years or younger and arrived at a decision to either cut or leave her uncut. Descriptive statistics summarizing the people involved in FGM/C-related decisions and the reasons for decisions are presented. We also present logistic regression analyses results summarizing predictors of households’ decision to leave the youngest daughter uncut. RESULTS: Household decision-making on FGM/C involved discussions among the nuclear and extended family, and non-family members. Mothers and fathers were found to be the key decision makers. A greater proportion of fathers were involved in instances where the final decision was to leave the daughter uncut. Thirty-six percent of households decided to leave the youngest daughter uncut. State of residence, mothers’ level of education and FGM/C status and exposure to FGM/C-related information or campaigns were associated with households’ decision to leave the daughter uncut. Health concerns were the most commonly cited reason for deciding not to cut their daughters (57%), while custom or culture was the most commonly cited reason for households deciding to cut their daughter (52%). CONCLUSION: FGM/C-related decisions result from deliberations that involve many people. Our findings underscore the important role that fathers play in decision-making and highlight the need to involve men in FGM/C programs. Findings also stress the need to understand and address the drivers of FGM/C. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6394000/ /pubmed/30859137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0096-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sabahelzain, Majdi M.
Gamal Eldin, Ahmed
Babiker, Suad
Kabiru, Caroline W.
Eltayeb, Muna
Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title_full Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title_short Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
title_sort decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in sudan: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0096-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sabahelzainmajdim decisionmakinginthepracticeoffemalegenitalmutilationorcuttinginsudanacrosssectionalstudy
AT gamaleldinahmed decisionmakinginthepracticeoffemalegenitalmutilationorcuttinginsudanacrosssectionalstudy
AT babikersuad decisionmakinginthepracticeoffemalegenitalmutilationorcuttinginsudanacrosssectionalstudy
AT kabirucarolinew decisionmakinginthepracticeoffemalegenitalmutilationorcuttinginsudanacrosssectionalstudy
AT eltayebmuna decisionmakinginthepracticeoffemalegenitalmutilationorcuttinginsudanacrosssectionalstudy