Cargando…
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. As more journals move to implement and experiment with the myriad of innovations covered by this term, there is a clear need for best...
Autores principales: | Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Görögh, Edit |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0063-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What is open peer review? A systematic review
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony
Publicado: (2017) -
Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
por: Tennant, Jonathan P., et al.
Publicado: (2020)