Cargando…

Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions is a growing area of research, but its application to nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is relatively under-studied. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the research that has been conducted on automated detection of NMSC using digital images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marka, Arthur, Carter, Joi B., Toto, Ermal, Hassanpour, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0307-7
_version_ 1783398823540817920
author Marka, Arthur
Carter, Joi B.
Toto, Ermal
Hassanpour, Saeed
author_facet Marka, Arthur
Carter, Joi B.
Toto, Ermal
Hassanpour, Saeed
author_sort Marka, Arthur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions is a growing area of research, but its application to nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is relatively under-studied. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the research that has been conducted on automated detection of NMSC using digital images and to assess the quality of evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of these technologies. METHODS: Eight databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and the ACM Digital Library) were searched to identify diagnostic studies of NMSC using image-based machine learning models. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles. The level of evidence of each study was evaluated using a five tier rating system, and the applicability and risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were reviewed. Twenty-four models were designed to detect basal cell carcinoma, two were designed to detect squamous cell carcinoma, and thirteen were designed to detect both. All studies were conducted in silico. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the classifiers, defined as concordance with histopathologic diagnosis, was high, with reported accuracies ranging from 72 to 100% and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.832 to 1. Most studies had substantial methodological limitations, but several were robustly designed and presented a high level of evidence. CONCLUSION: Most studies of image-based NMSC classifiers report performance greater than or equal to the reported diagnostic accuracy of the average dermatologist, but relatively few studies have presented a high level of evidence. Clinical studies are needed to assess whether these technologies can feasibly be implemented as a real-time aid for clinical diagnosis of NMSC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-019-0307-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63940902019-03-11 Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review Marka, Arthur Carter, Joi B. Toto, Ermal Hassanpour, Saeed BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions is a growing area of research, but its application to nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is relatively under-studied. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the research that has been conducted on automated detection of NMSC using digital images and to assess the quality of evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of these technologies. METHODS: Eight databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and the ACM Digital Library) were searched to identify diagnostic studies of NMSC using image-based machine learning models. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles. The level of evidence of each study was evaluated using a five tier rating system, and the applicability and risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were reviewed. Twenty-four models were designed to detect basal cell carcinoma, two were designed to detect squamous cell carcinoma, and thirteen were designed to detect both. All studies were conducted in silico. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the classifiers, defined as concordance with histopathologic diagnosis, was high, with reported accuracies ranging from 72 to 100% and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.832 to 1. Most studies had substantial methodological limitations, but several were robustly designed and presented a high level of evidence. CONCLUSION: Most studies of image-based NMSC classifiers report performance greater than or equal to the reported diagnostic accuracy of the average dermatologist, but relatively few studies have presented a high level of evidence. Clinical studies are needed to assess whether these technologies can feasibly be implemented as a real-time aid for clinical diagnosis of NMSC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-019-0307-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6394090/ /pubmed/30819133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0307-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marka, Arthur
Carter, Joi B.
Toto, Ermal
Hassanpour, Saeed
Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title_full Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title_fullStr Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title_short Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
title_sort automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0307-7
work_keys_str_mv AT markaarthur automateddetectionofnonmelanomaskincancerusingdigitalimagesasystematicreview
AT carterjoib automateddetectionofnonmelanomaskincancerusingdigitalimagesasystematicreview
AT totoermal automateddetectionofnonmelanomaskincancerusingdigitalimagesasystematicreview
AT hassanpoursaeed automateddetectionofnonmelanomaskincancerusingdigitalimagesasystematicreview