Cargando…

Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) improves sleep in chronic low back pain (CLBP). BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty over the effectiveness of TENS in CLBP. In most studies, pain intensity has been the primary outcome measure. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gozani, Shai N, Ferree, Thomas C, Moynihan, Martin, Kong, Xuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881088
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S196129
_version_ 1783398853615026176
author Gozani, Shai N
Ferree, Thomas C
Moynihan, Martin
Kong, Xuan
author_facet Gozani, Shai N
Ferree, Thomas C
Moynihan, Martin
Kong, Xuan
author_sort Gozani, Shai N
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) improves sleep in chronic low back pain (CLBP). BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty over the effectiveness of TENS in CLBP. In most studies, pain intensity has been the primary outcome measure. Although sleep abnormalities are common in CLBP, sleep outcomes have not been evaluated in most studies of TENS effectiveness. Subjective and objective sleep measures are often inconsistent in CLBP, suggesting that perception of sleep and actual sleep may differ. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated TENS for CLBP over 10 weeks. The source database included demographics, pain characteristics, pain intensity and interference on an 11-point numerical rating scale, adherence and actigraphic sleep data from real-world TENS users. Key inclusion criteria were CLBP with self-reported history of back injury and baseline pain interference with sleep ≥4. Study participants were stratified into improved and unimproved groups based on changes in pain interference with sleep (improved ≥1-point decrease). Actigraphic sleep metrics were compared between the two groups for weeks 1–2 and weeks 9–10. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 554 TENS users. There were 282 (50.9%) participants in the improved group and 272 (49.1%) in the unimproved group. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and high TENS adherence. At the weeks 1–2 assessment, there were no differences among actigraphic sleep. At the weeks 9–10 assessment, there was a difference in total sleep time, with the improved group sleeping 29 minutes longer. In addition, the periodic leg movement (PLM) index was lower in the improved group. CONCLUSION: Regular TENS improved self-reported and objective sleep measures in individuals with CLBP. When compared to the unimproved group, the improved group had longer total sleep time and fewer PLMs. Sleep may be an important outcome for TENS effectiveness in CLBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63942442019-03-15 Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study Gozani, Shai N Ferree, Thomas C Moynihan, Martin Kong, Xuan J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) improves sleep in chronic low back pain (CLBP). BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty over the effectiveness of TENS in CLBP. In most studies, pain intensity has been the primary outcome measure. Although sleep abnormalities are common in CLBP, sleep outcomes have not been evaluated in most studies of TENS effectiveness. Subjective and objective sleep measures are often inconsistent in CLBP, suggesting that perception of sleep and actual sleep may differ. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated TENS for CLBP over 10 weeks. The source database included demographics, pain characteristics, pain intensity and interference on an 11-point numerical rating scale, adherence and actigraphic sleep data from real-world TENS users. Key inclusion criteria were CLBP with self-reported history of back injury and baseline pain interference with sleep ≥4. Study participants were stratified into improved and unimproved groups based on changes in pain interference with sleep (improved ≥1-point decrease). Actigraphic sleep metrics were compared between the two groups for weeks 1–2 and weeks 9–10. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 554 TENS users. There were 282 (50.9%) participants in the improved group and 272 (49.1%) in the unimproved group. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and high TENS adherence. At the weeks 1–2 assessment, there were no differences among actigraphic sleep. At the weeks 9–10 assessment, there was a difference in total sleep time, with the improved group sleeping 29 minutes longer. In addition, the periodic leg movement (PLM) index was lower in the improved group. CONCLUSION: Regular TENS improved self-reported and objective sleep measures in individuals with CLBP. When compared to the unimproved group, the improved group had longer total sleep time and fewer PLMs. Sleep may be an important outcome for TENS effectiveness in CLBP. Dove Medical Press 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6394244/ /pubmed/30881088 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S196129 Text en © 2019 Gozani et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gozani, Shai N
Ferree, Thomas C
Moynihan, Martin
Kong, Xuan
Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title_full Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title_short Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
title_sort impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881088
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S196129
work_keys_str_mv AT gozanishain impactoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonsleepinchroniclowbackpainarealworldretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ferreethomasc impactoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonsleepinchroniclowbackpainarealworldretrospectivecohortstudy
AT moynihanmartin impactoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonsleepinchroniclowbackpainarealworldretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kongxuan impactoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonsleepinchroniclowbackpainarealworldretrospectivecohortstudy