Cargando…

Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions

The management of short-segment benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures refractory to currently available endoscopic treatments (endoscopic balloon dilation, intralesional steroid injection, incisional therapy and fully covered self-expanding metal stents) proves to be challenging. Lumen-apposing me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larson, Brian, Adler, Douglas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837786
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2018.0337
_version_ 1783398858178428928
author Larson, Brian
Adler, Douglas G.
author_facet Larson, Brian
Adler, Douglas G.
author_sort Larson, Brian
collection PubMed
description The management of short-segment benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures refractory to currently available endoscopic treatments (endoscopic balloon dilation, intralesional steroid injection, incisional therapy and fully covered self-expanding metal stents) proves to be challenging. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), originally developed for access to and drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, are being used in an off-label manner for the treatment of short GI luminal strictures. The short length and wide flanges make LAMS potentially suitable for this indication and may reduce complications and improve patient tolerance. In this article we review the published literature, including 138 patients from 4 retrospective studies and 13 case reports who received a LAMS for the treatment of a short GI luminal stricture. In the reviewed literature only 2 of the 138 cases had immediate adverse events warranting hospitalization: perforation and postoperative GI bleed. A total adverse event rate of 32.5% (45 of 138 cases) was reported. Migration was the most common adverse event, accounting for 40% of the total. Nearly 58% of reported patients had symptom and stricture resolution after stent removal in the reviewed studies. Follow up varied from 28-352 days after stent removal. Although more data are needed to determine their long-term safety and efficacy, LAMS represent an important alternative to traditional endoscopic options when approaching patients with short GI luminal strictures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63942632019-03-05 Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions Larson, Brian Adler, Douglas G. Ann Gastroenterol Review Article The management of short-segment benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures refractory to currently available endoscopic treatments (endoscopic balloon dilation, intralesional steroid injection, incisional therapy and fully covered self-expanding metal stents) proves to be challenging. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), originally developed for access to and drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, are being used in an off-label manner for the treatment of short GI luminal strictures. The short length and wide flanges make LAMS potentially suitable for this indication and may reduce complications and improve patient tolerance. In this article we review the published literature, including 138 patients from 4 retrospective studies and 13 case reports who received a LAMS for the treatment of a short GI luminal stricture. In the reviewed literature only 2 of the 138 cases had immediate adverse events warranting hospitalization: perforation and postoperative GI bleed. A total adverse event rate of 32.5% (45 of 138 cases) was reported. Migration was the most common adverse event, accounting for 40% of the total. Nearly 58% of reported patients had symptom and stricture resolution after stent removal in the reviewed studies. Follow up varied from 28-352 days after stent removal. Although more data are needed to determine their long-term safety and efficacy, LAMS represent an important alternative to traditional endoscopic options when approaching patients with short GI luminal strictures. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2019 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6394263/ /pubmed/30837786 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2018.0337 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Larson, Brian
Adler, Douglas G.
Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title_full Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title_fullStr Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title_short Lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
title_sort lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrointestinal luminal strictures: current use and future directions
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837786
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2018.0337
work_keys_str_mv AT larsonbrian lumenapposingmetalstentsforgastrointestinalluminalstricturescurrentuseandfuturedirections
AT adlerdouglasg lumenapposingmetalstentsforgastrointestinalluminalstricturescurrentuseandfuturedirections